Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

In reply to the discussion: Should EVIDENCE undermine FAITH? [View all]

MineralMan

(148,398 posts)
1. Religious beliefs are not rational, logical, or supported by fact.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 09:45 AM
Jun 2019

Still, many people cling to them desperately, for lack of anything better, they think. For most people, even for a very large majority, science is arcane and hard to understand. Most people have only a very limited understanding of any of the sciences. So, the same simple, incorrect explanations of phenomena are easier for them to accept in some ways.

Some understand that literal truth is hard to find in religious sources. Others believe things happened exactly as described in various scriptures. No amount of discussion will change their minds, because they do not understand the discussion.

That's why People Magazine outsells Scientific American by a huge percentage. Still, though, you can find both publications in the airport newsstands. Me? I pick up the latest Scientific American when I take a flight. It's more relevant to me than People Magazine.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Should EVIDENCE undermine...»Reply #1