The Bible has gone through so many translations and versions that for this atheist, it's hard to believe that the so-called inerrant word of god hasn't changed over the millennia. Earlier in my life, I studied Christianity in great detail for years and even considered a life as a minister. I've read the Bible several times, taught classes, been a leader in a congregation and even played organ and led the choir. I feel comfortable in my knowledge of the Bible and Christianity. In fact, it's why I finally left the faith but that's a different story for another time.
In high school, I read Merle Miller's "Plain Speaking," an oral biography of President Harry Truman. It was a wonderful experience that provides a personal yet profound impression of the former President. and I highly recommend the book to anyone who hopes for a return to an honest Constitutional order.
Regardless, President Truman expressed a deep understanding of the Bible and said that he preferred the King James Version because of its poetic nature. That always impacted me and I tended to prefer that person over the revisions or contemporary versions. As a composer, I've been commissioned to write a number religious choral or solo works and I've always used the KJV.
Upthread, I mentioned the Gnostic texts. These are the ancient texts that the Council of Nicaea rejected for the Bible. They're fascinating! It quickly becomes apparent why these books were not included as they contradict the (demonstrably false) narrative.
Sorry to go on on this holiday! Happy Thanksgiving to you.
= new reply since forum marked as read