Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

Warpy

(114,463 posts)

4. BBC was better, showing side by side images from JWT and Hubble

Reply to Duppers (Original post)

Wed Oct 19, 2022, 11:13 PM

Oct 2022

.webp

The four stars roughtly arranged in a square on the right side of the JWT image were completely obscured by dust in the Hubble image.

Decent article, too: https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-63319814

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Stunning new NASA pic [View all] Duppers Oct 2022 OP

The Hand of God? nt OAITW r.2.0 Oct 2022 #1

It looks like massive cartilage. GreenWave Oct 2022 #2

I see... Tree-Hugger Oct 2022 #3

BBC was better, showing side by side images from JWT and Hubble Warpy Oct 2022 #4

Ah, glad you posted this. Don't have a photo hosting acct. .. electric_blue68 Oct 2022 #5

Here's a comparison... Duppers Oct 2022 #6

Ah, ty. Wow! Cool... electric_blue68 Oct 2022 #7

If you put in "zoom into the Pillars of Creation" you'll get a nice 0.57 video from ESO.org... electric_blue68 Oct 2022 #8

Thank you, Duppers. ⭐️ Judi Lynn Oct 2022 #9

You're so welcome. Duppers Nov 2022 #10