Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

In reply to the discussion: Gus sold for $50.1M [View all]

SWBTATTReg

(26,598 posts)
2. I do believe that we, as supporters of the Arts, fossils (and all related to these fields) should belong to the people
Wed Jul 15, 2026, 01:21 PM
12 hrs ago

too, as well as Institutions too. They don't necessarily have to place these artifacts out of the price range of schools etc., they could lend or loan such artifacts to interested institutions (as long as they insure and / or protect the fossils and not damage them during their studies of such artifacts). Have some 'need to know' federal law that would mandate such mandatory sharing as well as insurance coverage, etc. But it seems like all fossils, all historic items such as older Indian artifacts/tools/etc., are or already have been pushed out of the everyday open markets and that only a few very stratified markets remain open to the general public still, at reasonable costs, should someone wish to get into collecting these artifacts.

Decent artifacts would still cost a bit, after all, if you've been in the field long enough, for Indian artifacts and/or decent fossils, rock samples or minerals, the somewhat decent ones and on up are pricey indeed.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Gus sold for $50.1M»Reply #2