Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Atheists & Agnostics
In reply to the discussion: I figured it was safer to reply here in A&A [View all]skepticscott
(13,029 posts)52. If it were voiced with the explicit acknowledgement
by the person saying it, that they know it doesn't REALLY work, then it would make sense (though still being an attaboy for self-delusion). But if it is used as apologetics and to deflect criticism of the obvious ineffectiveness of prayer in getting what you pray for, as it pretty much always is, then it's just vapid nonsense.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It is "uplifting", in the case of an earthquake, and a "warm embrace" for volcanoes.
Warren Stupidity
Apr 2015
#21
In a study of the effectiveness of prayer there was a slight negative outcome correlation
Warren Stupidity
Apr 2015
#26
I suppose there's something to be said about the negative impact of false hope
Major Nikon
Apr 2015
#28
No no no, you have it wrong. Posts CRITICAL of religion aren't allowed in GD. Positive Religion
Heddi
Apr 2015
#44
Oh, look, it's the compassionate christian who called atheists "childish pricks"
beam me up scottie
Apr 2015
#61