Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Atheists & Agnostics
In reply to the discussion: Pope demonstrates colossal ignorance and hypocrisy [View all]mountain grammy
(27,273 posts)94. My fundamentalist niece posted this:
"I don't care that America is welcoming the pope. I'll be glad when America welcomes Jesus." Jeeeeeeesus!
of course she got many "amens" for that.
It's scary as fuck to me when the pope sounds like the "sane" one in the room. Religions are desperate to grow their flocks, whether with fear and hatred or love and acceptance depends on the which way the wind is blowing, but the ultimate goal is the same; fill the pews and the coffers and kill us with kindness or just outright kill us.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Do you mean "Atheists & Agnostics"? Yes, I am aware. I happen to be an agnostic, FWIW.
Surya Gayatri
Sep 2015
#16
Rage and fury are very personal and subjective emotions. Saying that any pronouncement
Surya Gayatri
Sep 2015
#17
OK, I will change that to say that it should fill decent human beings who have a moral compass
PeaceNikki
Sep 2015
#23
No "personal" attack intended or implied. Simply a medically substantiated
Surya Gayatri
Sep 2015
#38
I personally try to transform anger into other less destructive sentiments. Not good for
Surya Gayatri
Sep 2015
#41
It bothers me A LOT that this pope is out there using his bully pulpit to spread ignorance and hate.
trotsky
Sep 2015
#56
I claim moral superiority to no-one. I'm surprised that you would cede that position to me.
Surya Gayatri
Sep 2015
#61
I prefer "hidebound" and "blinkered". Your particular lexical choice would not be mine.
Surya Gayatri
Sep 2015
#42
I don't hate him either. I find many of his utterances to be hateful bigotry.
Warren Stupidity
Sep 2015
#62
I'm not 'angry' and do not wish to become so. OTOH, whatever emotions others
Surya Gayatri
Sep 2015
#69
He said "tone policing". Meaning you came in here trying to paint US as hateful
PeaceNikki
Sep 2015
#73
'Perceptions' of tone are extremely subjective. The perceived 'painting' of anyone as anything
Surya Gayatri
Sep 2015
#75
You introduced the word "rage" in this thread in a very patronizing and arrogant manner.
PeaceNikki
Sep 2015
#80
I recall having incredibly pleasant interactions with you during the Charlie Hebdo massacre
PeaceNikki
Sep 2015
#82
Feel free to think what you will, Lord. My faith is my own and very personal.
Surya Gayatri
Sep 2015
#89
In the distant place and time where my character was formed, it was deemed
Surya Gayatri
Sep 2015
#98
Yes, "hidebound and blinkered", but not automatically "malevolent" with intent.
Surya Gayatri
Sep 2015
#37
He isn't changing dogma to oppose abortion rights. He's following existing dogma.
jeff47
Sep 2015
#44
He is not saying anything different than the last however many popes have said
Lordquinton
Sep 2015
#65