Atheists & Agnostics

Academic philosophy is not about activism and is not required to bend to the popular will of one ideology. I am agnostic and use Huxley's original definition. I do not care what version of atheism you ascribe to, but the rejection of Flew's redefinition is warranted. It is so warranted exactly because of the mentality of activist atheists, whom behave like strong atheists or anti-theists, but claim they are agnostic atheists. It is no more than a cop out that trolls on social media use to maintain a dominance of discussion, and it serves almost no use in philosophical discussion. I think I will be contacting them and thanking them for maintaining academic integrity.