Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)

3. This isn't a real paper.

Reply to HereSince1628 (Original post)

Tue Jun 19, 2012, 04:48 PM

Jun 2012

At least in the sense that it's been submitted to a reputable and/or peer reviewed journal.

A brief search on pubmed suggests that primal integration isn't even considered a legit theory by psychology.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Personality Disorder begins PRIOR TO CONCEPTION!!!! [View all] HereSince1628 Jun 2012 OP

Since that wasn't enough to provoke a single comment, here's more: HereSince1628 Jun 2012 #1

Try waiting more than two hours before giving up a thread for dead. laconicsax Jun 2012 #2

This isn't a real paper. laconicsax Jun 2012 #3

No it actually was printed in a journal, here is the citation: HereSince1628 Jun 2012 #4

I said reputable and/or peer reviewed journal. laconicsax Jun 2012 #5

Much of our modern pseudoscience was known to ancient cultures jberryhill Sep 2012 #16

Scepticism of objective scientific independent peer-review Dan Burdick Jul 2012 #8

We all know that the peer review process is not always totally objective... LeftishBrit Aug 2012 #13

Primal integration would not be considered legit by most of those whose publications would show up LeftishBrit Aug 2012 #14

Woo-woo BS. Odin2005 Jun 2012 #6

Seriously! Everyone knows that it's caused by the MMR vaccine. laconicsax Jun 2012 #7

While I haven't come across this particular person before... LeftishBrit Aug 2012 #9

Yes, I know. And I think it is wildly speculative rationalization without evidence. HereSince1628 Aug 2012 #10

I entirely agree LeftishBrit Aug 2012 #11

Very nice analysis. Chemisse Aug 2012 #12

What a load of bunkum! ericburns4 Aug 2012 #15

Well if THAT won't make you feel guilty about jerking off, nothing will jberryhill Sep 2012 #17