Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

LiberalEsto

(22,845 posts)
6. Yeah
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:15 PM
Feb 2016

Wikipedia:
"In 1997, U.S. Social Security Administration Commissioner John Callahan issued a court memorandum officially recognizing MCS "as a medically determinable impairment" on an agency-wide basis.[44] That is, without making any statement about the cause of MCS or the role of chemicals in MCS, the Social Security administration agrees that some MCS patients are too disabled to be meaningfully employed"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_chemical_sensitivity


From the same Wikipedia article (my comments in italics in parentheses):

"A 1999 consensus statement recommends that MCS be diagnosed according to six standardized criteria:[1][34]

Symptoms are reproducible with repeated (chemical) exposures (Mine certainly are)
The condition has persisted for a significant period of time (Some things have affected me for 50 years)
Low levels of exposure (lower than previously or commonly tolerated) result in manifestations of the syndrome (i.e. increased sensitivity) (Yes)
The symptoms improve or resolve completely when the triggering chemicals are removed (Yes)
Responses often occur to multiple chemically unrelated substances (Yes)
Symptoms involve multiple-organ symptoms (runny nose, itchy eyes, headache, scratchy throat, ear ache, scalp pain, mental confusion or sleepiness, palpitations of the heart, upset stomach, nausea and/or diarrhea, abdominal cramping, aching joints).(Absolutely, in my case)

From: "Multiple chemical sensitivity: a 1999 consensus". Arch. Environ. Health 54 (3): 147–9. 1999. doi:10.1080/00039899909602251. PMID 10444033.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»Another quack who was dis...»Reply #6