Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progressoid

(50,897 posts)
4. Anti pesticide tinkering is one of the many advantages of genetic engineering.
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 01:52 PM
Apr 2016

Take the sugar beet for instance.

Since 2009, glyphosate tolerant sugar beets have made up more than 95 percent of the commercial sugar beet production in the U.S. Over that time, inputs and productivity data gathered from farmer-owned cooperatives show 25 environmental benefits to using GE sugar beets, ranging from 20 percent higher yields and reduced chemical input, to implementation of conservation tillage and reduced fossil fuel consumption. The findings highlight the importance of genetic engineering in the long term sustainability of the farmer-owned industry.

https://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/2015/12/14/myth-busting-no-thing-gmo-sugar/


Also, http://www.democraticunderground.com/1016150132

...The growers’ cost of herbicides has dropped from $66 per acre to $11 per acre since they switched from non-GMO sugar beets in 2008. The cost of hand labor has dropped from $60 an acre to zero, since it is no longer needed.

And, yes, the price of seed has increased, from $44 to $143. But at the same time, yields have also increased.

Overall, the net margin increase has been $122 per acre, said Grant, who farms near Rupert, Idaho.

In total, the switch to GMO sugar beets has meant a $22 million benefit to the cooperative and its members, he said.

A meta-study — which reviewed 147 other studies — found that by growing GMO crops farmers have reduced pesticide use by 37 percent. At the same time, farmers’ profits have increased by 68 percent....


Less chemical use. Lower carbon footprint. Better income.
Win win win.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»Novella Wrote A Great Pie...»Reply #4