Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience

Showing Original Post only (View all)

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
Tue Sep 13, 2016, 09:51 AM Sep 2016

Study: Sugar Industry Secretly Paid Harvard Researchers to Blame Fat for Health Risks [View all]

In 2007, Cristin Kearns was a general manager at Kaiser Permanente, where she ran a large group of dental practices. She was working with medical doctors at Kaiser to figure out ways they could provide better care for patients with diabetes, who are more likely to have gum disease. The work took her to a conference in Seattle focused on the links between the two diseases. As she watched the talks, attended the panel discussions, and read the materials handed out, she was struck by one thing: No one seemed to be talking about sugar. Even a pamphlet intended for diabetic dental patients didn’t suggest cutting back on sugar.

“I had this experience, which I found to be very strange, and I was wondering whether the sugar industry had an influence” on what was included in those patient materials, Kearns said in an interview. So she started digging. “I had a full-time job—research journalism wasn’t part of my job. I just was Googling at night after work.”

Today, as a postdoctoral researcher at the University of California, San Francisco, Kearns is publishing research based on the documents that her casual Googling led to: a trove of confidential documents, correspondence, and other materials that detail the relationship between the sugar industry and medical researchers in the 1960s and ’70s that UCSF has taken to calling the “Sugar Papers.”

Last year, she and her colleagues revealed that the sugar industry worked with the National Institutes of Health during those years to create a federal program to combat tooth decay in children that did not recommend limiting sugar consumption. On Monday, in a paper published in The Journal of the American Medical Association, Kearns details how in the 1960s, the leading sugar industry trade group paid three Harvard researchers nearly $50,000 in today’s dollars to publish a literature review that would link fat and cholesterol—and not sugar—to increased risk of heart disease.

The Sugar Research Foundation, which is now called the Sugar Association, “set the review’s objective, contributed articles for inclusion, and received drafts,” according to ...

https://www.yahoo.com/beauty/sweet-lies-sugar-industry-tricked-us-worrying-fat-233649580.html

Open access study published online: http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2548255
September 12, 2016
Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research
A Historical Analysis of Internal Industry Documents
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
At the time, researchers all over the country were noticing a generational increase Warpy Sep 2016 #1
That simply doesn't hold water; it's bunk and explicitly refuted by the evidence found. kristopher Sep 2016 #2
You're assuming one grant covered all research everywhere Warpy Sep 2016 #3
Write your opinion to Dr. Kearns, she is the one refuting your claim kristopher Sep 2016 #4
A more balanced perspective than the hype of today's "press." HuckleB Sep 2016 #5
That just tries to gloss over the corruption in academic research. kristopher Sep 2016 #6
No, it doesn't. HuckleB Sep 2016 #7
It's amazing how those who shout "science" loudest always go straight to personal attacks. kristopher Sep 2016 #8
Mr. Pot? Have you met Mr. Kettle? OKIsItJustMe Sep 2016 #9
Walking around muttering to yourself again? kristopher Sep 2016 #10
Muttering to myself, eh? OKIsItJustMe Sep 2016 #11
And we're still waiting kristopher Sep 2016 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author HuckleB Sep 2016 #13
Awww. That's cute. HuckleB Sep 2016 #14
Really?? kristopher Sep 2016 #15
The press, sir, is reporting on a peer-reviewed study. JackRiddler Oct 2016 #19
And the press did not give the full story. HuckleB Nov 2016 #20
That's some fantasy you have there. JackRiddler Nov 2016 #21
So when no fat started weight started going up. That is very telling! ScienceIsGood Sep 2016 #16
The glycemic index; the glycemic load kristopher Oct 2016 #17
Thanks for the great info. n/t ScienceIsGood Oct 2016 #18
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»Study: Sugar Industry Sec...»Reply #0