Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience

Showing Original Post only (View all)
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Because, 90% of the time, Miguelito Loveless Jul 2020 #1
Bingo Sherman A1 Jul 2020 #2
I would suggest that 90% of the time ... Laelth Jul 2020 #3
True, but they aren't the paper they used to be either still_one Jul 2020 #4
I guess it would depend on the time period Miguelito Loveless Jul 2020 #5
That was depressing, admittedly. n/t Laelth Jul 2020 #7
Maggie Haberman is still there Miguelito Loveless Jul 2020 #8
Rogue X-Files fan on staff? nt CatLady78 Jul 2020 #6
What, exactly, is the criticism of the actual piece by the NYT? better Jul 2020 #9
+1. Ditto. yonder Aug 2020 #11
They're heeeere... progressoid Jul 2020 #10
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»Why is the NY Times sprea...»Reply #0