Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience

Everyone reading this is more than welcome to read fully for context. You're great at pointing fingers at others who you feel need your fingerpointing skills, but you don't seem at all comfortable when someone asks you to explain yourself. This is incongruent with your statments, since you've invited me and everyone else to look through your FR posts. In the H&M thread you started on this very topic, a thread that has over 200 responses, you got to a point where you told people you'd no longer answer any of their questions. There are several things you said that people have asked you about, and you've refused to answer. You're doing it again, and using the politician's excuse of context. That's why that little blue link is there. I excerpted, but the full page, and therefore full context, is available just by clicking and reading.

You can refuse to answer questions, but don't think that your lame "out of context" rejoinder is something that's even remotely plausible. Let it be known that when the rubber hits the road, you refuse to answer questions that you yourself invited others to ask. I'll let you get back to making fun of people who like heartwarming stories now, but don't dare ever try to tell me about logic, scientific inquiry, and truth again--and don't try to browbeat people in other forums for being irrational, illogical, or evasive. You've run from all of these principles right here in this thread, and you're utterly devoid of any legitimate authority to talk about such things, most especially when it comes to your habit of attempting to leverage yourself above others by belittling what they're talking about.