Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BootinUp

(49,169 posts)
Mon Jun 20, 2016, 03:13 PM Jun 2016

Washington Post On Hillary and Donald’s Unfavorable Ratings: ‘There Is Just No Comparison’ [View all]



The media are fond of reminding us that Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump both have high unfavorable ratings. However, the reasons for those unfavorables couldn’t be more different – not to mention that Donald’s are “setting modern records for political toxicity.”

By BNR Team
June 17, 2016

Much breathless discussion has been had among members of the national media about the high unfavorable numbers attached to both major-party presidential candidates. But one of these things is not like the other.

For one, Hillary’s high unfavorables are, as explained by Peter Daou, “the result of a billionaire-funded conservative effort to destroy her image.” For decades, she has been subjected to a relentless campaign of character assaults and rank sexism, until demonstrably false narratives about her get repeated – even and especially by journalists ostensibly reporting only facts – as though they were true.

--------snip

Greg Sargent took a look at an analysis of Donald’s “historically high” unfavorables and notes: “While Hillary Clinton is also disliked, there is just no comparison to Trump.”


--------snip

Conversely, most of the people who don’t like Donald can articulate precisely why without hesitation. There’s no invocation of some hazy unease based on something they might have heard once upon a time. It’s a concrete list of objections, a litany recounting any number of his myriad failings.

And this despite the fact that over the past year, the media have been tipping the scales in his favor.

Full Article at BNR
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I've yet to see an unfavorable poll in which... SaschaHM Jun 2016 #1
Best analysis I've seen on this topic The_Casual_Observer Jun 2016 #2
I think Clinton's unfavorables will decline. David__77 Jun 2016 #3
Thank you, Boot.. love the pic of our zany Hill fans. lol Cha Jun 2016 #4
That's a great image! Very fun :-) Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #5
K&R ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #6
Aided and abetted by the media. LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #7
HRC and her unfavorables... HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #8
Good thing its a 7.6% lead then. BootinUp Jun 2016 #9
+1 grossproffit Jun 2016 #10
you should be concerned... HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #11
We are a long way from November. Quite satisfied with BootinUp Jun 2016 #12
We aren't a 'long way' from optics... HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #13
rofl. nt BootinUp Jun 2016 #17
Why? Shrub was President just like Reagan. whatthehey Jun 2016 #14
..why... HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #15
320 is more than "just enough" TwilightZone Jun 2016 #16
neither is 'just enough' HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #19
WHAT difference does it make whatthehey Jun 2016 #24
'single extra item of power or authority' HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #30
I know this is a waste of my time posting NastyRiffraff Jun 2016 #18
..unfavorables.. HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #20
Okay, I'm done with you. NastyRiffraff Jun 2016 #21
Winning matters. Nothing else. Either POTUS or not, no margin standards. whatthehey Jun 2016 #23
...winning at what cost... HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #29
we don't know that anybody is at their worst at this point magical thyme Jun 2016 #25
I've thought for some time Trump will drop out. Goblinmonger Jun 2016 #27
I'm leaning towards Mittens myself magical thyme Jun 2016 #28
First, I think that link shows that the difference is 3.4% lead. Goblinmonger Jun 2016 #26
"It’s a concrete list of objections." Ding, ding, ding. Garrett78 Jun 2016 #22
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Washington Post On Hillar...»Reply #0