Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)

20. Why?

Reply to Omaha Steve (Original post)

Sun Jul 24, 2016, 02:35 PM

Jul 2016

I think we've had enough public platform meetings to know how some of the Bernie folks will act when they don't get their way. Maybe they wanted to get some work done instead of having to deal with chants, jeers, and stunts when the losing side loses.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

We allow anyone to be spectators at caucuses, DNC rules meetings etc, until yesterday [View all] Omaha Steve Jul 2016 OP

Bernie got much to close for comfort. Rules will be changed, added and fortified NorthCarolina Jul 2016 #1

Disruptors to meetings ARE NOT WELCOME! MohRokTah Jul 2016 #2

Your defending hiding our process Omaha Steve Jul 2016 #5

Their intent was clearly spelled out. MohRokTah Jul 2016 #7

First a smaller room to hide in Omaha Steve Jul 2016 #8

I'm glad every one of the disrupting assholes was thrown out! MohRokTah Jul 2016 #11

I am so glad you were there, could you please post the video? insta8er Jul 2016 #14

Especially with the likes of Cornell West. LiberalFighter Jul 2016 #15

Ah, so anyone with a different POV is a "disrupter" and a miscreant. 99th_Monkey Jul 2016 #16

Sounds like a Trump rally... StraightRazor Jul 2016 #19

No, anyone who shows up with the intent of disrupting is disrupter. NYC Liberal Jul 2016 #28

Steve, you're complaining because the DNC didn't change the laws of physics to let more geek tragedy Jul 2016 #10

Why go to a much smaller room than last week without notice? Omaha Steve Jul 2016 #12

neither of us knows the answer to that. geek tragedy Jul 2016 #13

Nope--all meetings are indoors where there are fire codes and just because it never occurred to you bettyellen Jul 2016 #27

You missed the room change to small one in the W Post Omaha Steve Jul 2016 #29

For the same reason the rules were changed after the Mccarthy candidacy. guillaumeb Jul 2016 #3

They showed up intending to disrupt. That's an exception worth making. stevenleser Jul 2016 #4

PROVE IT! Omaha Steve Jul 2016 #6

Prove what? That protesters were there to protest? You want to rethink that? nt stevenleser Jul 2016 #32

There were Bernie delegates that couldn't get in Omaha Steve Jul 2016 #33

What you linked to said "TRNN brings youprotesters demanding entry into the Democratic Party rules stevenleser Jul 2016 #34

They didn't protest until they were locked out Omaha Steve Jul 2016 #36

This message was self-deleted by its author geek tragedy Jul 2016 #9

Kick and Rec!! n/t 99th_Monkey Jul 2016 #17

Bernie lost...get over it...nt joeybee12 Jul 2016 #18

The party lost when the tricks like shutting out observers became correct policy Omaha Steve Jul 2016 #21

No, YOU don't get it... joeybee12 Jul 2016 #22

It's in the W Post Omaha Steve Jul 2016 #23

And your article proves my point... joeybee12 Jul 2016 #24

You are arguing against the DEMOCRATIC party being open Omaha Steve Jul 2016 #25

Yeah, right... joeybee12 Jul 2016 #26

There is video of that and open chairs comments Omaha Steve Jul 2016 #30

Why? SaschaHM Jul 2016 #20

Gee, the DNC probably should have secretly worked to derail his campaign then. NorthCarolina Jul 2016 #31

ouch. nasty nasty 2banon Jul 2016 #35