Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

UCmeNdc

(9,650 posts)
Sat Nov 26, 2016, 07:09 AM Nov 2016

Should have a standard voting system within the United States [View all]

The approximate costs of a recount in Pennsylvania weren't immediately available, but the vote-rich state is being targeted even with its wider Trump victory margin because two-thirds of the state's counties, including its most populous, use electronic voting machines that don't leave a paper trail, The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported. Experts have demonstrated that such machines can be hacked even without being hooked up to the Internet.

Similar machines are scattered in some of the smaller counties in Wisconsin. About 1 in 10 votes in the state's April presidential primary came from such machines.

All of Michigan's voting machines have paper ballots that can be recounted, election officials there said.




Why the ad lib voting system?

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I agree that all voting methods should have a proper audit trail... TreasonousBastard Nov 2016 #1
A less personal, but far more common example to me... Wounded Bear Nov 2016 #7
random testing of machines is not sufficient. we need all hand-counted paper ballots. it has been d TheFrenchRazor Nov 2016 #9
I'm was a poll worker in NJ. no_hypocrisy Nov 2016 #2
"Why the ad lib voting system?"... because per the Constitution, the voting process is delegated to Grey Lemercier Nov 2016 #3
There is no sane reason for that BSdetect Nov 2016 #4
Only way to fix it is a constitutional amendment. Read the Federalist papers to see why Grey Lemercier Nov 2016 #5
I agree with your assessment except UCmeNdc Nov 2016 #6
that will take a constitutional amendment Grey Lemercier Nov 2016 #8
That's fascinating. I'll have to come back to read up on it later. Hekate Nov 2016 #11
I agree that changing the size of the House would be a better way SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #13
yep, thats the Wyoming Rule I listed. I think its better than nothing Grey Lemercier Nov 2016 #15
50 states. States' Rights. Each state "a laboratory for democracy." I think it should be federalized Hekate Nov 2016 #10
K&R BSdetect Nov 2016 #12
I agree PatSeg Nov 2016 #14
The farce of Bush v. Gore Danmel Nov 2016 #16
right; we've had a repub loser "win" twice in 16 years, on untrustworthy voting machines. nt TheFrenchRazor Nov 2016 #18
Three times, probably DFW Nov 2016 #20
I'm afraid somebody is going to have to white hat hack and obliterate an election. tandem5 Nov 2016 #17
it may take something like that. nt TheFrenchRazor Nov 2016 #19
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Should have a standard vo...»Reply #0