Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Retrograde

(10,882 posts)
7. It's not exactly new
Mon Nov 28, 2016, 03:10 PM
Nov 2016

the process has been in place since 1789, ostensibly to keep one section of the country from being dominant (back then it was New England vs New York/Pennsylvania vs the South), but populations have shifted drastically since then. We've seen two failures since 2000, both cases where the winner of the popular vote lost the electoral college vote do to the heavy weighting of sparsely populated rural states.

Unforunately, abolishing it requires the votes of those thinly settled states, who like the power it gives them too much to do so.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»As one of the 538 Elector...»Reply #7