Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

portlander23

(2,078 posts)
14. NAFTA was a right-wing idea
Sun Dec 4, 2016, 06:55 PM
Dec 2016
The North American Free Trade Agreement: Ronald Reagan's Vision Realized
Michael G. Wilson
Heritage Foundation
Nov 23, 1993

Long-Standing Support for Free Trade with Mexico. Ronald Reagan first proposed a free trade agreement between the U.S. and Mexico in his 1980 presidential campaign. Since that time, The Heritage Foundation is proud of the role it has played in articulating President Reagan's vision of free trade in Latin America and around the world. Since the mid-1980s, Heritage analysts have been stressing that a free trade agreement with Mexico not only will stimulate economic growth in the U.S., but will make Mexico a more stable and prosperous country. Heritage has published over three dozen studies stressing the benefits of free trade in North America.

The Politics of Fear vs. the Politics of Hope. The approval of the NAFTA not only represents a victory for the U.S. economy and the American people, it also deals a blow to organized labor and other protectionist forces. The agreement reaffirms the American commitment to competition and free enterprise that other nations emulate.

By supporting the NAFTA, the Clinton Administration and a majority of Congress wisely rejected calls for a return to the same protectionist policies, demonstrated by the Smoot-Hawley tariff laws, which helped create the Great Depression. Many of these protectionist calls were from labor unions concerned that the NAFTA would cost U.S. jobs in older industries. Despite such concerns, though, labor will see that, as consumers in a growing economy, they too are better off when nations are free to trade with one another and workers are exposed to the rigors of international competition.


Free trade is a straight-up right wing creation. The Democratic Party used to be aligned with working people, a history you see reflected in the congressional Democratic resistance to TTP and the pushback from organized labor. It was only since the Clinton presidency that the Democrats begrudgingly became the other party of free trade.

Yes, there is a difference between left and right wing populism, and Mr. Trump certainly became a right-wing populist in his racist appeal, but the rhetorical move against free trade (we shall see how real it turns out to be), is indeed flanking the Democrats to the left.

The question is whether or not the party can move past it's free trade past.
Good analysis cilla4progress Dec 2016 #1
NAFTA was passed by a republican Congress and left for incoming Pres Clinton TheDebbieDee Dec 2016 #37
I also heard Thomas Friedman cilla4progress Dec 2016 #38
The writer needed to interview me and lots of people like me who weren't moved by Trump.. JHan Dec 2016 #2
Were you someone who voted for Obama twice and then Trump this past November? EL34x4 Dec 2016 #20
Yes whole year they've been asking why... JHan Dec 2016 #23
But, without the TPP China is free to take over even more of our trade... TreasonousBastard Dec 2016 #3
China and Russia...it'll create a void, both countries will scoop it up. JHan Dec 2016 #5
In terms of trade the 1,000,000 dollar question is... nycbos Dec 2016 #4
Ask Germany how they do it realmirage Dec 2016 #6
What makes Germany successful runs counter to everything Trump proposes. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #17
Google the percentage of Germans realmirage Dec 2016 #18
Read again what I wrote. And do some research on the German economy. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #21
Yep.. JHan Dec 2016 #25
It seems simple answers for complex problems are all the rage. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #28
I think it's motivated reasoning: we choose the information that fits in with our biases. JHan Dec 2016 #30
That's certainly a factor, as well. People believe what they want to believe. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #31
I read it. Here's the data you should consider realmirage Dec 2016 #33
You're not addressing the nature of those manufacturing jobs vs. ours. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #34
You can't argue against the facts I just gave you realmirage Dec 2016 #35
Your data has zero context. You're ignoring the nature of those jobs. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #36
Smoot-Hawley is overblown portlander23 Dec 2016 #9
Of course trade protectionism wasn't the cause. nycbos Dec 2016 #13
It certainly spawned retaliation portlander23 Dec 2016 #15
This is the message of our future if we want to survive realmirage Dec 2016 #7
He didn't move to Clinton's left. He went populist- andym Dec 2016 #8
NAFTA was a right-wing idea portlander23 Dec 2016 #14
Incorrect-- Free trade is strongly associated with FDR (progressive) and then both parties andym Dec 2016 #19
Complete nonsense portlander23 Dec 2016 #22
You obviously didn't read the article or much else on the history of free trade andym Dec 2016 #32
Anyone who believed what Trump was saying mcar Dec 2016 #10
The wake-up call here ... NanceGreggs Dec 2016 #11
I know he lost me at "rhetorical left" anyway ismnotwasm Dec 2016 #40
Not Your Grandmothers Wisconsin elleng Dec 2016 #12
Suggestion: you might want to put quotation marks around your thread title. Ken Burch Dec 2016 #16
An earlier article about Rebecca Theoni... SidDithers Dec 2016 #24
No words for this kind of idiocy mcar Dec 2016 #29
Wow. Democracy is dead. "He explains it in layman's terms." lostnfound Dec 2016 #41
I remember the many TPP threads here. mia Dec 2016 #26
Idiots MFM008 Dec 2016 #27
Nancy will take care of it. coco22 Dec 2016 #39
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»"Then I saw Donald Trump,...»Reply #14