Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: "Then I saw Donald Trump, and he got out there and showed he was serious about keeping jobs" [View all]portlander23
(2,078 posts)14. NAFTA was a right-wing idea
The North American Free Trade Agreement: Ronald Reagan's Vision Realized
Michael G. Wilson
Heritage Foundation
Nov 23, 1993
Free trade is a straight-up right wing creation. The Democratic Party used to be aligned with working people, a history you see reflected in the congressional Democratic resistance to TTP and the pushback from organized labor. It was only since the Clinton presidency that the Democrats begrudgingly became the other party of free trade.
Yes, there is a difference between left and right wing populism, and Mr. Trump certainly became a right-wing populist in his racist appeal, but the rhetorical move against free trade (we shall see how real it turns out to be), is indeed flanking the Democrats to the left.
The question is whether or not the party can move past it's free trade past.
Michael G. Wilson
Heritage Foundation
Nov 23, 1993
Long-Standing Support for Free Trade with Mexico. Ronald Reagan first proposed a free trade agreement between the U.S. and Mexico in his 1980 presidential campaign. Since that time, The Heritage Foundation is proud of the role it has played in articulating President Reagan's vision of free trade in Latin America and around the world. Since the mid-1980s, Heritage analysts have been stressing that a free trade agreement with Mexico not only will stimulate economic growth in the U.S., but will make Mexico a more stable and prosperous country. Heritage has published over three dozen studies stressing the benefits of free trade in North America.
The Politics of Fear vs. the Politics of Hope. The approval of the NAFTA not only represents a victory for the U.S. economy and the American people, it also deals a blow to organized labor and other protectionist forces. The agreement reaffirms the American commitment to competition and free enterprise that other nations emulate.
By supporting the NAFTA, the Clinton Administration and a majority of Congress wisely rejected calls for a return to the same protectionist policies, demonstrated by the Smoot-Hawley tariff laws, which helped create the Great Depression. Many of these protectionist calls were from labor unions concerned that the NAFTA would cost U.S. jobs in older industries. Despite such concerns, though, labor will see that, as consumers in a growing economy, they too are better off when nations are free to trade with one another and workers are exposed to the rigors of international competition.
The Politics of Fear vs. the Politics of Hope. The approval of the NAFTA not only represents a victory for the U.S. economy and the American people, it also deals a blow to organized labor and other protectionist forces. The agreement reaffirms the American commitment to competition and free enterprise that other nations emulate.
By supporting the NAFTA, the Clinton Administration and a majority of Congress wisely rejected calls for a return to the same protectionist policies, demonstrated by the Smoot-Hawley tariff laws, which helped create the Great Depression. Many of these protectionist calls were from labor unions concerned that the NAFTA would cost U.S. jobs in older industries. Despite such concerns, though, labor will see that, as consumers in a growing economy, they too are better off when nations are free to trade with one another and workers are exposed to the rigors of international competition.
Free trade is a straight-up right wing creation. The Democratic Party used to be aligned with working people, a history you see reflected in the congressional Democratic resistance to TTP and the pushback from organized labor. It was only since the Clinton presidency that the Democrats begrudgingly became the other party of free trade.
Yes, there is a difference between left and right wing populism, and Mr. Trump certainly became a right-wing populist in his racist appeal, but the rhetorical move against free trade (we shall see how real it turns out to be), is indeed flanking the Democrats to the left.
The question is whether or not the party can move past it's free trade past.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Then I saw Donald Trump, and he got out there and showed he was serious about keeping jobs" [View all]
portlander23
Dec 2016
OP
NAFTA was passed by a republican Congress and left for incoming Pres Clinton
TheDebbieDee
Dec 2016
#37
The writer needed to interview me and lots of people like me who weren't moved by Trump..
JHan
Dec 2016
#2
But, without the TPP China is free to take over even more of our trade...
TreasonousBastard
Dec 2016
#3
I think it's motivated reasoning: we choose the information that fits in with our biases.
JHan
Dec 2016
#30
That's certainly a factor, as well. People believe what they want to believe.
Garrett78
Dec 2016
#31