Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JHan

(10,173 posts)
23. Yes whole year they've been asking why...
Sun Dec 4, 2016, 07:34 PM
Dec 2016

We've had article after article, whole year, interviewing Trump supporters like they were precious, special things.

And there are many reasons why many possibly switched to Trump.

But I'm grateful to Washington Post for challenging the narrative that Hillary's economic message didn't resonate with voters in swing states:

"
"Exit polls show Hillary Clinton winning a majority of the vote from people who told pollsters that the economy was the most important issue facing the country. What's more, in each state, a majority of voters said that was the case. "

"The exit poll questionnaire gave voters a choice between four options for the most important issue. Clinton was generally preferred by those who said foreign policy was the most important issue, too, but Trump was preferred by those who saw immigration or terrorism as most important. The key is the margins. On average, about 13 percent of people in the 27 states said foreign policy was most important and they preferred Clinton by an average of 30 points. On average, voters who said the economy was most important preferred Clinton by 7.3. But on terrorism, rated most important by a fifth of voters, on average, Trump led by an average of 21.8 points. On immigration (most important to an average of 12.2 percent of respondents)? A huge 42.1 percentage point lead for Trump.""



https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/12/02/in-nearly-every-swing-state-voters-preferred-hillary-clinton-on-the-economy/?utm_term=.0de6de61afa7
Good analysis cilla4progress Dec 2016 #1
NAFTA was passed by a republican Congress and left for incoming Pres Clinton TheDebbieDee Dec 2016 #37
I also heard Thomas Friedman cilla4progress Dec 2016 #38
The writer needed to interview me and lots of people like me who weren't moved by Trump.. JHan Dec 2016 #2
Were you someone who voted for Obama twice and then Trump this past November? EL34x4 Dec 2016 #20
Yes whole year they've been asking why... JHan Dec 2016 #23
But, without the TPP China is free to take over even more of our trade... TreasonousBastard Dec 2016 #3
China and Russia...it'll create a void, both countries will scoop it up. JHan Dec 2016 #5
In terms of trade the 1,000,000 dollar question is... nycbos Dec 2016 #4
Ask Germany how they do it realmirage Dec 2016 #6
What makes Germany successful runs counter to everything Trump proposes. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #17
Google the percentage of Germans realmirage Dec 2016 #18
Read again what I wrote. And do some research on the German economy. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #21
Yep.. JHan Dec 2016 #25
It seems simple answers for complex problems are all the rage. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #28
I think it's motivated reasoning: we choose the information that fits in with our biases. JHan Dec 2016 #30
That's certainly a factor, as well. People believe what they want to believe. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #31
I read it. Here's the data you should consider realmirage Dec 2016 #33
You're not addressing the nature of those manufacturing jobs vs. ours. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #34
You can't argue against the facts I just gave you realmirage Dec 2016 #35
Your data has zero context. You're ignoring the nature of those jobs. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #36
Smoot-Hawley is overblown portlander23 Dec 2016 #9
Of course trade protectionism wasn't the cause. nycbos Dec 2016 #13
It certainly spawned retaliation portlander23 Dec 2016 #15
This is the message of our future if we want to survive realmirage Dec 2016 #7
He didn't move to Clinton's left. He went populist- andym Dec 2016 #8
NAFTA was a right-wing idea portlander23 Dec 2016 #14
Incorrect-- Free trade is strongly associated with FDR (progressive) and then both parties andym Dec 2016 #19
Complete nonsense portlander23 Dec 2016 #22
You obviously didn't read the article or much else on the history of free trade andym Dec 2016 #32
Anyone who believed what Trump was saying mcar Dec 2016 #10
The wake-up call here ... NanceGreggs Dec 2016 #11
I know he lost me at "rhetorical left" anyway ismnotwasm Dec 2016 #40
Not Your Grandmothers Wisconsin elleng Dec 2016 #12
Suggestion: you might want to put quotation marks around your thread title. Ken Burch Dec 2016 #16
An earlier article about Rebecca Theoni... SidDithers Dec 2016 #24
No words for this kind of idiocy mcar Dec 2016 #29
Wow. Democracy is dead. "He explains it in layman's terms." lostnfound Dec 2016 #41
I remember the many TPP threads here. mia Dec 2016 #26
Idiots MFM008 Dec 2016 #27
Nancy will take care of it. coco22 Dec 2016 #39
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»"Then I saw Donald Trump,...»Reply #23