Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

In reply to the discussion: It isn't really that hard [View all]

NRQ891

(217 posts)
6. it's evil to vote for a racist, but
Mon Dec 5, 2016, 11:01 AM
Dec 2016

it is also evil to put someone in the position where they have to choose between voting for someone who has already sold them out, or a racist. I don't think this party has any intention of facing that (at least what I've seen so far, present company excepted)

it's the moral hazard of voting for the 'lesser of the evils'. If both sides are convinced that the population will reliably do it, the choices will be guaranteed to get progressively more evil. The voter who votes for the 'lesser of the evils', while voting for less evil today, is still a passive enabler of future evil, which could ultimately end up be as evil or worse than today's choice

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»It isn't really that hard»Reply #6