Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
5. Of course Clinton wasn't as strong a candidate as Obama.
Mon Dec 5, 2016, 03:40 PM
Dec 2016

Though she did end up with about the same number of votes as Obama received 4 years ago.

First of all, Obama was replacing Bush. Obama is younger and had less political history to critique (Clinton was victimized by decades' worth of hate--someone else with the exact same message and strategy would have carried those battleground states, even if that person also faced unprecedented FBI interference).

Obama preceded the 2013 Shelby County v. Holder decision, which enabled massive voter suppression.

Throughout US history, there's been a white backlash against racial progress (including the election of Obama and his executive action that produced DACA)--that backlash has built up over the last 8 years and was exploited by an overtly bigoted candidate who was endorsed by the KKK and sucked all of the media air(waves) out of the room. Add that to the overt misogyny in a race against the first major party female candidate in history.

And, yes, Obama did more outreach to the rural areas of purple states like Iowa.

None of which changes the fact that the "working class whites/economic messaging" narrative collapses under scrutiny.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Youth, yes. Organized lab...»Reply #5