Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

In reply to the discussion: Tip of a massive iceberg? [View all]

magicarpet

(16,557 posts)
11. Break a security seal - then document entry to it as to who/why/wherefor - .......
Mon Dec 5, 2016, 06:37 PM
Dec 2016

.....then install a new witnessed security seal to all panels/doors/internal access points that could be used to tamper with the accurate counting of the electronic voting equipment to assure a free and fair election.

~~~~~~~

As stated in previous (fbaggins #8) comment above:

St. Croix County municipalities use DS200 scanners from ES&S. After the equipment was purchased, ES&S sent out a technician to install modems in the scanners, which are used on Election Night to transmit unofficial results to the county. In order install a modem, the technician was required to break a “warranty seal” on a door on the scanner.

Unfortunately, the technician apparently did not replace those seals on the doors after completing his work.

(snip) ~ end previous comment above.

~~~~~~~

~~~~~~~

Unless theses security seals are in place and properly recorded as to being intact at each and every step upon the way - up to the date of voting and beyond - seals being properly intact upon a recount and possible internal workings recount inspection - absent unbroken security seals - the chain of custody is faulty/potentially open to contamination of the integrity of the electronic voting equipment and its ability to accurately count and tabulate the votes with any confidence manipulation or tampering or molestation of the vote did not take place.

It matters not what St. Croix County Election Administrators or what the ES&S modem installation technician is willing to swear and attest to. Once the "Warranty"/Security Seal was broken to gain entry access - the access was not properly documented - and new security seals were not re-installed and properly re-witnessed - the security door was needlessly left ajar for any future unwarranted entry to their pleasure to come and go at their free will - undetected - no matter how ill their intentions may have been.

This is banana republic voting - the citizens of the United States of America deserve and should demand better than that.

~~~~

Tampered seals on Wisconsin vote counting machines now being blamed on “modems”
By Bill Palmer | December 4, 2016

(snip) ~

In a familiar refrain which is growing all too tiresome, Wisconsin officials are once again blaming it all on “modems.”

(snip) ~

But what stands out is that this is the third separate instance of Wisconsin officials using modems to explain suspicious circumstances. Another recount observer in Kenosha County reports that officials are blaming modems. And last week, Palmer Report was the first to report that a Wisconsin elections official also blamed a “modem” error for incorrectly padding Donald Trump’s vote total in Sauk County.

The sheer number of instances in which Wisconsin elections officials are blaming “modems” for everything from tampered seals, to impossible vote totals, stands out as noteworthy in and of itself. While vote counting machines do in fact use modems to remotely pass along their totals, these modems are verging on becoming a too frequently used excuse. As the Wisconsin recount continues, election officials in the state may have some further explaining to do.

http://www.palmerreport.com/news/modems-tampered-seals-wisconsin-recount/374/

~~~~~

(snip) ~

Verified Voting, which describes itself as a “non-partisan non-profit organization” and has a Board of Directors which includes six people with Ph.D. doctorates, has an entire page of guidelines for those precincts using the ES&S DS200 vote counting machines. Halfway down the page, here’s what stands out:

“Ideally, the DS200’s exposed ports, memory card access areas, ballot box doors and case seams would be covered with tamper-evident security seals. The integrity of these seals should be maintained at all times, and only breached under controlled, explained circumstances. Seals should be logged to maintain chain of custody of sensitive materials.”

http://www.palmerreport.com/news/voting-integrity-wisconsin-broken-seals-machines/358/

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Tip of a massive iceberg?»Reply #11