2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Bill Press: Sanders didnt damage Clintons public image [View all]JHan
(10,173 posts)The wall street speeches? The so called damaging excerpts are hardly even remarkable and in some instances enlightening... the money? This automatically means a candidate is corrupt? Have words lost their meaning now?
Sanders lumped the entire democratic party as being in the pocket of special interest groups - you really think this was the argument to make in 2016 during a General Election year, an incumbent year when Democrats usually find it difficult to recapture the presidency?
If Sanders wanted to prove to me he cared so much about the Democratic Party he would have joined years ago, worked on cementing his progressive ideas among the rank and file through influence, and do the hard work all democrats have had to do to rise in the ranks.
Instead he joined last year, played sanctimonious, tarnished the image of the Party which played right into the hands of Trump.