Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
Wed Dec 7, 2016, 06:34 PM Dec 2016

If you think HRC focused on social justice more than economic justice [View all]

It is because you don't care about social justice and it likely doesn't apply to you

As someone who needs both to live, I found her to be very focused on both.

Not one to the exclusion of the other.

If you didn't maybe its because you believe social justice should be secondary to economic justice. Not equal to, but inferior to.

72 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mahalo, La Lioness Cha Dec 2016 #1
So what criticisms can one level about how HRC handled economic justice? el_bryanto Dec 2016 #2
I'd say ones that do not perpetuate the lie that it cost her the election. bettyellen Dec 2016 #3
Hmmmm so we aren't allowed to critisize how she handled the campaign el_bryanto Dec 2016 #4
Better a half loaf than nothing at all leftofcool Dec 2016 #10
Yeah that'd be great - if your candidate had won. But I don't think she did. nt el_bryanto Dec 2016 #12
"Your candidate?" mcar Dec 2016 #34
As I've said elsewhere I voted for Clinton - I wanted her to win. el_bryanto Dec 2016 #49
That means she was your candidate too. So you should have said "Our candidate", right? nt stevenleser Dec 2016 #68
Well I said that after the election - technically she's nobodys candidate el_bryanto Dec 2016 #72
I was specific about perpetuating the nonsense it was a deciding factor. bettyellen Dec 2016 #18
Ones based in actual fact La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #5
Just a suggestion, but this is not the appropriate website to trash Democrats. n/t Lil Missy Dec 2016 #7
Ah - ok. el_bryanto Dec 2016 #8
Is Bernie a Democrat now? When did he change from being Independent? leftofcool Dec 2016 #11
Just confirming - you can crap on Bernie Sanders and his supporters el_bryanto Dec 2016 #14
Clearly, there are plenty of people dumping on both Hillary and Bernie. TwilightZone Dec 2016 #15
Bernie is not a Democrat, nor are many of his supporters. This is not the place to trash Democrats. Lil Missy Dec 2016 #33
No its not. Especially given the rules GummyBearz Dec 2016 #56
He was "registered" as a Democrat for a couple minutes. Before and after he was Independent, Lil Missy Dec 2016 #58
Some people see what they want to see. And perhaps still smarting about ... someone else ...... Lil Missy Dec 2016 #6
The people insisting that economics is the answer to everything seem to want an easy solution. TwilightZone Dec 2016 #9
No one doesn't know this. RadiationTherapy Dec 2016 #43
K&R ismnotwasm Dec 2016 #13
Exactly mcar Dec 2016 #16
Her policies addressed both, but due to Trump's rhetoric she focused more on one NoGoodNamesLeft Dec 2016 #17
She won on the economy, including in the rust belt states, TwilightZone Dec 2016 #26
I think she was covered more or social issues, then on economic issues La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #39
Mostly right Cosmocat Dec 2016 #51
Post removed Post removed Dec 2016 #19
Sorry we don't exist to amuse you La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #20
What do you exist for? Red Oak Dec 2016 #27
Not for your amusement La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #36
Trump was the entertainer, Clinton was the pragmatist. Solving problems and addressing issues.... George II Dec 2016 #22
No one is forcing you to stay here. So please go somewhere where you won't be bored.nt pnwmom Dec 2016 #28
It was a long campaign and she pretty much focused extensively on just about every issue... George II Dec 2016 #21
If one remains ignorant of her positions on the issues... TwilightZone Dec 2016 #23
Simply put - "you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink"! George II Dec 2016 #31
You are so right, George! brer cat Dec 2016 #24
She was focused on all the right issues elmac Dec 2016 #25
THIS Cosmocat Dec 2016 #52
Social justice and economic justice are NOT mutually exclusive. PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2016 #29
knr, La Lioness Hekate Dec 2016 #30
I truly don't think anyone here believes that. Ken Burch Dec 2016 #32
Why is it so important for you to minimize my concerns La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #35
Concerns can be raised without accusing people of planning to betray or exclude you. Ken Burch Dec 2016 #66
you act as though you experience the world, or DU, or democrats the same way i do La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #69
I know you and I experience the world differently. Ken Burch Dec 2016 #70
You seem to never mean to belittle but somehow always do La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #71
Agree with all you said! Madam45for2923 Dec 2016 #37
One could accuse you of being wealthy for the same simple reasons. RadiationTherapy Dec 2016 #38
one could, but one would be amusingly wrong. nt La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #40
Precisely. I am similarly amused at the assessment in your op. RadiationTherapy Dec 2016 #41
i did start the OP by saying both are important to me, i want a job La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #42
Post removed Post removed Dec 2016 #44
and what ideas are you offering? let me hear your brilliance. La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #46
His brilliance is... TwilightZone Dec 2016 #48
I don't think she focused on either very much. hollowdweller Dec 2016 #45
that is completely untrue. she had so many policy speeches and conversations La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #47
for the 1,000,000 time Cosmocat Dec 2016 #50
I thought the election was over Faux pas Dec 2016 #53
Because you're in the post-mortem forum BainsBane Dec 2016 #55
lol because this is posted in 2016 Postmortem (Forum) La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #57
lol Faux pas Dec 2016 #63
well then trash the forum. i will defend HRC as long as this forum is open La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #64
It's hard for me to see those efforts BainsBane Dec 2016 #54
I think her focus on social justice was perfect. OnionPatch Dec 2016 #59
yes, we can. however, let's just get a few fact straight first La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #60
I don't think the jobs issue was the only factor. OnionPatch Dec 2016 #65
I've never been able to figure out how you could have one without the other. Pacifist Patriot Dec 2016 #61
FDR can show you how to have economic justice without social justice La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #62
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2016 #67
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»If you think HRC focused ...»Reply #0