Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: If you think HRC focused on social justice more than economic justice [View all]TwilightZone
(28,833 posts)15. Clearly, there are plenty of people dumping on both Hillary and Bernie.
And it's quite obviously being allowed, within reason. Some idiot who thanked god that Hillary lost and wrote about 50 posts about it was understandably suspended a little earlier today. So, there's your limit.
Considering that the vast majority of discussion is about why Hillary lost, the dumping is currently weighted pretty heavily toward her, justified and otherwise.
Just because you think you're oppressed doesn't mean you are.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If you think HRC focused on social justice more than economic justice [View all]
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
OP
Yeah that'd be great - if your candidate had won. But I don't think she did. nt
el_bryanto
Dec 2016
#12
That means she was your candidate too. So you should have said "Our candidate", right? nt
stevenleser
Dec 2016
#68
Just a suggestion, but this is not the appropriate website to trash Democrats. n/t
Lil Missy
Dec 2016
#7
Bernie is not a Democrat, nor are many of his supporters. This is not the place to trash Democrats.
Lil Missy
Dec 2016
#33
He was "registered" as a Democrat for a couple minutes. Before and after he was Independent,
Lil Missy
Dec 2016
#58
Some people see what they want to see. And perhaps still smarting about ... someone else ......
Lil Missy
Dec 2016
#6
The people insisting that economics is the answer to everything seem to want an easy solution.
TwilightZone
Dec 2016
#9
Her policies addressed both, but due to Trump's rhetoric she focused more on one
NoGoodNamesLeft
Dec 2016
#17
I think she was covered more or social issues, then on economic issues
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#39
Trump was the entertainer, Clinton was the pragmatist. Solving problems and addressing issues....
George II
Dec 2016
#22
No one is forcing you to stay here. So please go somewhere where you won't be bored.nt
pnwmom
Dec 2016
#28
It was a long campaign and she pretty much focused extensively on just about every issue...
George II
Dec 2016
#21
Concerns can be raised without accusing people of planning to betray or exclude you.
Ken Burch
Dec 2016
#66
you act as though you experience the world, or DU, or democrats the same way i do
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#69
i did start the OP by saying both are important to me, i want a job
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#42
that is completely untrue. she had so many policy speeches and conversations
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#47
well then trash the forum. i will defend HRC as long as this forum is open
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#64
I've never been able to figure out how you could have one without the other.
Pacifist Patriot
Dec 2016
#61
FDR can show you how to have economic justice without social justice
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#62