Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
18. Not true.
Fri Dec 9, 2016, 07:44 PM
Dec 2016

I don't support Rahm(he's a reactionary scumbag and I never liked him) and my comments have been about campaign strategy, not attacks on Hillary as a person.

I despise the right-wing attacks on her since the Nineties. Always have.

Why is it so important to you to try to prove that I'm working against the party and against you? And why does it sound like you are bound and determined to get me kicked off of this board?

I'm a Democrat. I'm an anti-oppression, pro-social AND economic justice progressive. I'm on YOUR side. And I campaigned for the ticket all fall.

All I'm trying to do is help us find a way to get the votes we need next time-and to do so without selling anyone out. There's no way to do that by moving further right on anything.

The reason I mentioned the DLC and the Third Way is that, unlike the Sanders campaign, those groups actually DID throw historically oppressed communities under the bus. It was THOSE groups that pushed a totally unnecessary "law and order" agenda that specifically targeted people of color as a group, that called on the party to accept the Republican myth that drug use, welfare fraud and out-of-wedlock childbirth were largely "black things&quot in reality, they were always mostly white things), and that sought the votes of working-class whites by pandering to the worst prejudices of that group, unlike the Sanders supporters who haven't called for the party to validate white male delusions at all. Yet, as far as I know, you always gave THOSE groups a total pass.

If you didn't give those groups a pass while at the same time demonizing Sanders supporters as closet white supremacists, I stand corrected.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why would we want this punk anyway? I didn't forget what you did. NWCorona Dec 2016 #1
Rahm, say it aint so? This is the man who is one of the original DLCers. He was soundly JCanete Dec 2016 #2
Rahm? BeyondGeography Dec 2016 #3
Then again, when Rahm talks about "an economically robust message"... Ken Burch Dec 2016 #4
I think it's pretty obvious why suddenly Dems are bolstering this populist message - bettyellen Dec 2016 #7
Bernie didn't "use the party"...he ran in the Democratic primaries because he HAD to... Ken Burch Dec 2016 #11
He used and discarded the Dems. And you imply Dems are the sellouts? Well, that's telling. bettyellen Dec 2016 #12
Not "Dems"...the right wing of the party...the DLC and the Third Way. Ken Burch Dec 2016 #13
You are bashing Dems, always have. bettyellen Dec 2016 #14
Critique is not "bashing". Ken Burch Dec 2016 #16
Who is DLC and third way now? bettyellen Dec 2016 #17
Not true. Ken Burch Dec 2016 #18
Who was part of this third way recently? Like while DU has been around? Sounded like you think they bettyellen Dec 2016 #20
I brought them up because they actually DID throw women people of color and gays under the bus. Ken Burch Dec 2016 #21
I'm sorry but you're not making sense. Labeling people third way is cowardly divisive bullshit. bettyellen Dec 2016 #22
Loyal Dems are trashed as "Third Way" - but Republican Trump voters must be understood and embraced EffieBlack Dec 2016 #25
You, Mr. Burch, have stranger81 Dec 2016 #23
Thanks. Ken Burch Dec 2016 #24
BTW, my first post in this thread was pointing out that Rahm's notion of a "robust" economic program Ken Burch Dec 2016 #19
Fuck Rahm !!! SamKnause Dec 2016 #5
HA all of a sudden Rahm should be respected? Any port in a storm. bettyellen Dec 2016 #6
He's too busy fucking our city with a 14 kt. dildo. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Dec 2016 #8
Just as well, 'cause I don't want his sorry ass anywhere. . . DinahMoeHum Dec 2016 #9
Wasn't Rahm opposed to Chairman Dean's 50-State Strategy? (nt) JaneQPublic Dec 2016 #10
Social justice is being used as wedge issue right here for Christ sakes... NoGoodNamesLeft Dec 2016 #15
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Rahm rules out DNC chair ...»Reply #18