Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Remember when many of us thought the Dem primaries were rigged? [View all]hellofromreddit
(1,182 posts)55. That's a lot of false assumptions and poor reasoning
the GOP never said a word against Bernie during the primaries
Never? False. https://politicaladarchive.org/ad/polad_berniesanders_ckd5l/
We now know that the Republicans had oppo research on Bernie - why did they never use it?
Again, not never, but let's just give that one to you and see how it pans out.
With a 17-way primary on their own side it's somehow surprising that they never got around to attacking Sanders? Maybe they were busy. Maybe they were inept. Maybe they saw how it blew up in Clinton's face and decided not to bother. You've provided zero argument to eliminate any possibility; you just let the question hang there as if doing so means something.
We know that Republicans voted FOR Bernie in open primaries - why do you suppose they did that?
Oh, god forbid we have a politician who can reach across party lines to get things done. Besides, that's been happening for years. To believe that this is something related to the presidential race, you'd have to believe the republicans knew years out that Sanders would run.
And again with the dangly question thing.
It was because the GOP wanted Bernie to be the nominee, because they knew he'd be easier to beat in the GE than Hillary.
To quote NanceGreggs: "In light of the actual facts, your theory makes no sense whatsoever." It could just as easily be that they didn't take Sanders seriously and ignored him (much like US media), or that they went with what they knew, and what they knew just happened to be attacking Clinton all day. You haven't narrowed it down even a little.
It also raises a big question without answering it: if the gop can coordinate so well that they can prop up Sanders while they're in the midst of an expensive 17-way primary, why can't the dems coordinate well enough to turn out the damn vote?
I give your conspiracy theory 2 out of 5 foil hats. Because I'm nice.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Your theory about the GOP wanting Bernie because he'd be easier to beat makes no sense either
mtnsnake
Dec 2016
#11
Republicans couldn't care less about getting a "verbal beating" from Bernie Sanders
EffieBlack
Dec 2016
#32
Nance, the fact that you had to resort to insults, not once, but several times, speaks volumes
mtnsnake
Dec 2016
#33
I remember, and also that those who did so were ridiculed and bullied here in this very forum
jack_krass
Dec 2016
#10
Cinton was attacked by Russia. Trump wasn't attacked by Russia. Sanders wasn't attacked bt Russia.
baldguy
Dec 2016
#44
Point to ANY evidence that voting was hacked...in either the Primary or the GE
brooklynite
Dec 2016
#39
Bernie was not an obstacle...for whatever reason the GOP wanted him....so no there is no evidence
Demsrule86
Dec 2016
#46
possible, but much more likely is the Russians planted all those stories about the election being
Fast Walker 52
Dec 2016
#50
Many here were also using Russian Times articles during the primaries that always hurt HRC...
Madam45for2923
Dec 2016
#56