Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Another thing I don't get is progressives who love Tulsi Gabbard but rail against blue dogs [View all]NCDem777
(458 posts)38. Well what legal ground do we have to remove him?
When did we become the final arbiters of how a country should or should not handle violent rebel groups? Who gave us the right?
And perhaps more pertinent here, what if a removal blows up in our face?
I'm a little sketchy about doing anymore regime changes in the Middle East. Last time we did that, we got ISIS for the trouble. And let's be honest, every time we do get involved in the region, we tend to make things worse.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Another thing I don't get is progressives who love Tulsi Gabbard but rail against blue dogs [View all]
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
OP
I try not to expect consistent beliefs of anyone at either extreme of the political spectrum.
LonePirate
Dec 2016
#2
actually most liberals in india do. i know this because i am from india and have a large set of
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#52
Not to pick nits, i think that classifies as more of a slaughter or massacre than a genocide
dionysus
Dec 2016
#81
there is still hope gabbard will take a job with the trump admin so we can get a real progressive nt
msongs
Dec 2016
#5
oh god. that's not a real thing is it? i heard that it maybe true for heidi heitcamp
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#6
In the case of Tulsi, it comes down to she endorsed Sanders. Nothing else matters, not her record
KittyWampus
Dec 2016
#16
You're not going back far enough. Stop quoting the recent stuff, when her profile was raised.
MADem
Dec 2016
#45
Her father is a Roman Catholic. She learned a lot of her hate at her daddy's knee.
MADem
Dec 2016
#64
I simply pointed out her father's religion as a counterpoint to your assumption that I felt
MADem
Dec 2016
#66
I don't know why she thinks as she does. She is a Muslim - hater, though. Her comments
MADem
Dec 2016
#84
yeah, the love of Tulsi is unwarranted. if that's the best the dems can do from her district
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#68
No one with a brain thinks that pipeline is a smart idea. Doesn't make them "liberal."
MADem
Dec 2016
#78
Only about a dozen in Congress signed that letter of protest to President Obama
oberliner
Dec 2016
#79
She "modified" those public positions because her attitudes weren't selling in her district.
MADem
Dec 2016
#85
Probably not - but I do appreciate you taking the time to engage in this conversation
oberliner
Dec 2016
#94
Is there supposed to be a difference, now? In the past, people used the term progressive
dionysus
Dec 2016
#82
GIRL! I got a hide a week back cause I pointed out Tulsi loves guns and hates Muslims...
KittyWampus
Dec 2016
#14
First we need to recognized she endorsed Sanders. After that, many other things make sense.
KittyWampus
Dec 2016
#17
I seem to remember a young man named Barack Obama who did pretty well for himself
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#47
probably that as the field goes our choices suck? Its better to choose candidates that are at least
JCanete
Dec 2016
#26
She's a favorite of Bannon's for God's sake. Why would we even entertain trusting . . .
brush
Dec 2016
#42
I think you didn't read my post, where i clearly said, if thats the best we can do in that district
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#46
Missed it. totally with you on that then. Are there those who are doing that, or just those
JCanete
Dec 2016
#48
the chair should only remain ONLY as long as it's mathematically possible for someone to win
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#55
i am saying that had she been a clinton supporter your words would be far harsher toward Tulsi
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#62
yes, and I am not saying you have to vilify her. it's your attitude towards Cuomo
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#67
there was no reason for that allegation, not a shred of proof, not a single thing.
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#73