Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)In retrospect, the strongest argument that should have been made against electing Trump [View all]
beyond his obvious unpresidential qualities was the rubber stamping of the conservative agenda the GOP had planned-- especially against the safety net-- Medicare etc. The GOP had made very clear what they were planning. So few ads really emphasized this idea (some did), even though elected Democrats knew what could come if Trump won. Even Democratic Senate and House candidates probably did not publicize this enough as perhaps the key reason to reduce rather than add to GOP power. But the public, outside of politically active partisans, basically had very little idea what was coming-- and now they are in for a surprise.
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In retrospect, the strongest argument that should have been made against electing Trump [View all]
andym
Jan 2017
OP
It's not like Hillary, with her $1.2 BILLION campaign chest, couldn't afford to come up with some catchy bumpa stickers and a few hats.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jan 2017
#26
mostly of his supporters were voting against the safety net since they see it as minorities taking
JI7
Jan 2017
#2
they don't see those or anything they personally get as govt programs. this is why they didn't think
JI7
Jan 2017
#5
Many claim their trump vote was for economic reasons, but IMO it was to make America white . . .
brush
Jan 2017
#11
DT was also lying about this -- saying that he had no intention to touch Social Security
pnwmom
Jan 2017
#6
You're right...but doing that would require our "expert" Democratic strategists to accept...
Ken Burch
Jan 2017
#22