Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Please tell me more Botany Jan 2017 #1
WTF is THAT sposed to mean!! InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2017 #4
I was wondering that myself n/t. ogradda Jan 2017 #25
I think I love you. cyclonefence Jan 2017 #26
On this morning's breakfast menu we are featuring TheCowsCameHome Jan 2017 #2
The McDonald Big Breakfast! shraby Jan 2017 #3
That was my first thought.. Cha Jan 2017 #5
Wow, mention the name Bernie Sanders and the snark really comes out. Sad. monmouth4 Jan 2017 #6
So.... Laurian Jan 2017 #7
I wasn't stating a solution to the sexism problem - just an observation. Joe941 Jan 2017 #9
And it's way past time to confront it. Laurian Jan 2017 #10
Your analysis ignores valid reasons why voters rejected Sanders in the primary Gothmog Jan 2017 #8
I doubt sexism is a problem for the democratic primary voters... Joe941 Jan 2017 #11
Sanders was on the ballot in 2016 and under performed Clinton Gothmog Jan 2017 #14
Thank you, Goth, "Bernie Sanders Was On The 2016 Ballot  And He Underperformed Hillary Clinton" Cha Jan 2017 #16
Sanders would have been destroyed by trump in the general election Gothmog Jan 2017 #17
He may have lost to Trump but I doubt he would have been destroyed. kickitup Jan 2017 #27
Thanks for your posts, Gothmog! BlueMTexpat Jan 2017 #46
Thank you for your post Gothmog Jan 2017 #47
Good, factual post. And it might help if Sanders worked on his revolution now instead of . . . brush Jan 2017 #32
Sanders was rejected by Jewish, African American and Latino voters Gothmog Jan 2017 #36
What's up with that? Those voters are a big part of the base. His obsession with WWC cost him ... brush Jan 2017 #37
Sanders' whole campaign was based on a so-called revolution that never materialized Gothmog Jan 2017 #48
I don't know what you hoped accomplished by creating this thread... SharonClark Jan 2017 #12
So Hillary shouldn't have run because she is a woman mcar Jan 2017 #13
I didn't say that. I'm merely saying it was Joe941 Jan 2017 #18
Keep digging mcar Jan 2017 #20
Can you believe this shit?... SidDithers Jan 2017 #19
Sometimes there are not enough walls, Sid mcar Jan 2017 #21
No Cha Jan 2017 #23
Sanders had no chance of being nominee and ran for media coverage Gothmog Jan 2017 #15
He had a chance. It was a small chance given the party commitment to HRC. aikoaiko Jan 2017 #24
Sanders had no chance after Super Tuesday but stayed in Gothmog Jan 2017 #30
You keep repeating these opinion pieces on how Bernie couldn't win as if they are gospel. aikoaiko Jan 2017 #39
I believe in Math and the math was clear after Super Tueday Gothmog Jan 2017 #40
It would have been a very different primary, but we can't conclude that he would have won. Orsino Jan 2017 #22
Sanders never did release his tax returns Gothmog Jan 2017 #31
Here is why he wouldn't: the Russian oligarchs would have opposed him just as pnwmom Jan 2017 #28
Yep. It was rigged for Trump from the beginning, I think. Fast Walker 52 Jan 2017 #34
There's a place to hang one's hat. nt. NCTraveler Jan 2017 #29
And here's why he may well have lost badly Fast Walker 52 Jan 2017 #33
+1. n/t pnwmom Jan 2017 #35
Still unconvincing. (nt) Paladin Jan 2017 #38
Consider all the harshly critical attacks on Bernie from Republicans during the primaries DFW Jan 2017 #41
+1. n/t pnwmom Jan 2017 #43
Welll he'd have to start by winning the primary La Lioness Priyanka Jan 2017 #42
Well there is that minor issue. LOL. nt fleabiscuit Jan 2017 #44
Woulda Shoulda Coulda.. only BS lost the primary by 4 Millions Cha Jan 2017 #45
Didn't work that way in the Primary. Lil Missy Jan 2017 #49
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Here is why Bernie would ...»Reply #3