Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Here is why Bernie would have won. [View all]pnwmom
(109,562 posts)28. Here is why he wouldn't: the Russian oligarchs would have opposed him just as
strongly as they did Hillary. They wanted their puppet DT, and the last thing the formerly socialist country wanted was a socialist leader in the US.
And they would have had plenty of material to work with in Bernie's past, from his visits to Cuba, Venezuela, and the USSR.
In addition to Russia, the RNC had a 2 foot thick file of opposition research on Bernie, according to Newsweek.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Thank you, Goth, "Bernie Sanders Was On The 2016 Ballot And He Underperformed Hillary Clinton"
Cha
Jan 2017
#16
Good, factual post. And it might help if Sanders worked on his revolution now instead of . . .
brush
Jan 2017
#32
What's up with that? Those voters are a big part of the base. His obsession with WWC cost him ...
brush
Jan 2017
#37
Sanders' whole campaign was based on a so-called revolution that never materialized
Gothmog
Jan 2017
#48
You keep repeating these opinion pieces on how Bernie couldn't win as if they are gospel.
aikoaiko
Jan 2017
#39
It would have been a very different primary, but we can't conclude that he would have won.
Orsino
Jan 2017
#22