Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Here is why Bernie would have won. [View all]brush
(58,774 posts)37. What's up with that? Those voters are a big part of the base. His obsession with WWC cost him ...
the nomination and would have cost him the general too as it's hardly likely that enough white working class voters would have voted for a socialist, especially after the repug got through with associating him with Castro, Marx, Lenin, government takeover of the factories, much higher taxes, etc.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Thank you, Goth, "Bernie Sanders Was On The 2016 Ballot And He Underperformed Hillary Clinton"
Cha
Jan 2017
#16
Good, factual post. And it might help if Sanders worked on his revolution now instead of . . .
brush
Jan 2017
#32
What's up with that? Those voters are a big part of the base. His obsession with WWC cost him ...
brush
Jan 2017
#37
Sanders' whole campaign was based on a so-called revolution that never materialized
Gothmog
Jan 2017
#48
You keep repeating these opinion pieces on how Bernie couldn't win as if they are gospel.
aikoaiko
Jan 2017
#39
It would have been a very different primary, but we can't conclude that he would have won.
Orsino
Jan 2017
#22