Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: "Calling it for what it is" unusual these days... [View all]NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)37. I agree with this.
"When the WSJ says they will not call lies, lies...I believe we are sliding down a very slippery slope.
When our reps do not call out lies and misinformation, we are more than sliding, we are colluding."
I disagree that I am asking you to be PC by requesting you not use a phrase that insinuates the soft little jigglies of men as a portrayal of societal toughness. I'm requesting you not be sexist. It has nothing to do with political correctness.
Thank you for the edit.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The GOP have all three branches of government and will soon have the courts...
Demsrule86
Jan 2017
#16
ah! the death of unilateral "post-partisan" political prostration? Can't come too soon!
Bill USA
Jan 2017
#7
shhhh, don't you know that pointing this out is what gives political correctness a bad name?????
niyad
Jan 2017
#34