Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DFW

(56,535 posts)
41. Consider all the harshly critical attacks on Bernie from Republicans during the primaries
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 06:36 PM
Jan 2017

If you can find any, that is. The Republicans usually never uttered a peep about Sanders, who should have been their ideological worst enemy. Hillary was downright acceptable to them in the face of anyone who called themselves a "democratic socialist," both words being the political equivalent of blasphemy to any self-respecting right wing nut case.

The Republicans left Sanders alone not because they considered him less of an ideological foe than he indeed was, but because they saw Hillary Clinton as their likely opponent, and welcomed any chance to weaken her that they could get in advance of the GE campaign. Sanders provided them with plenty of help and ammunition. Certainly not because he wanted to help the Republicans--he had no illusions about them being the worst of all possible outcomes--, but because he was so narrowly focused on his anti-Hillary message that he never saw (or cared?) how useful he was being to his own worst political enemies until it was too late. While the "I-Hate-Hillary" crowd was spreading the mantra of "Killary is the lesser of two evils," the Republicans were preparing some real evil right under all our noses in peace and quiet and very much out of the scrutinizing eye of an all-too-complicit media.

Please tell me more Botany Jan 2017 #1
WTF is THAT sposed to mean!! InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2017 #4
I was wondering that myself n/t. ogradda Jan 2017 #25
I think I love you. cyclonefence Jan 2017 #26
On this morning's breakfast menu we are featuring TheCowsCameHome Jan 2017 #2
The McDonald Big Breakfast! shraby Jan 2017 #3
That was my first thought.. Cha Jan 2017 #5
Wow, mention the name Bernie Sanders and the snark really comes out. Sad. monmouth4 Jan 2017 #6
So.... Laurian Jan 2017 #7
I wasn't stating a solution to the sexism problem - just an observation. Joe941 Jan 2017 #9
And it's way past time to confront it. Laurian Jan 2017 #10
Your analysis ignores valid reasons why voters rejected Sanders in the primary Gothmog Jan 2017 #8
I doubt sexism is a problem for the democratic primary voters... Joe941 Jan 2017 #11
Sanders was on the ballot in 2016 and under performed Clinton Gothmog Jan 2017 #14
Thank you, Goth, "Bernie Sanders Was On The 2016 Ballot  And He Underperformed Hillary Clinton" Cha Jan 2017 #16
Sanders would have been destroyed by trump in the general election Gothmog Jan 2017 #17
He may have lost to Trump but I doubt he would have been destroyed. kickitup Jan 2017 #27
Thanks for your posts, Gothmog! BlueMTexpat Jan 2017 #46
Thank you for your post Gothmog Jan 2017 #47
Good, factual post. And it might help if Sanders worked on his revolution now instead of . . . brush Jan 2017 #32
Sanders was rejected by Jewish, African American and Latino voters Gothmog Jan 2017 #36
What's up with that? Those voters are a big part of the base. His obsession with WWC cost him ... brush Jan 2017 #37
Sanders' whole campaign was based on a so-called revolution that never materialized Gothmog Jan 2017 #48
I don't know what you hoped accomplished by creating this thread... SharonClark Jan 2017 #12
So Hillary shouldn't have run because she is a woman mcar Jan 2017 #13
I didn't say that. I'm merely saying it was Joe941 Jan 2017 #18
Keep digging mcar Jan 2017 #20
Can you believe this shit?... SidDithers Jan 2017 #19
Sometimes there are not enough walls, Sid mcar Jan 2017 #21
No Cha Jan 2017 #23
Sanders had no chance of being nominee and ran for media coverage Gothmog Jan 2017 #15
He had a chance. It was a small chance given the party commitment to HRC. aikoaiko Jan 2017 #24
Sanders had no chance after Super Tuesday but stayed in Gothmog Jan 2017 #30
You keep repeating these opinion pieces on how Bernie couldn't win as if they are gospel. aikoaiko Jan 2017 #39
I believe in Math and the math was clear after Super Tueday Gothmog Jan 2017 #40
It would have been a very different primary, but we can't conclude that he would have won. Orsino Jan 2017 #22
Sanders never did release his tax returns Gothmog Jan 2017 #31
Here is why he wouldn't: the Russian oligarchs would have opposed him just as pnwmom Jan 2017 #28
Yep. It was rigged for Trump from the beginning, I think. Fast Walker 52 Jan 2017 #34
There's a place to hang one's hat. nt. NCTraveler Jan 2017 #29
And here's why he may well have lost badly Fast Walker 52 Jan 2017 #33
+1. n/t pnwmom Jan 2017 #35
Still unconvincing. (nt) Paladin Jan 2017 #38
Consider all the harshly critical attacks on Bernie from Republicans during the primaries DFW Jan 2017 #41
+1. n/t pnwmom Jan 2017 #43
Welll he'd have to start by winning the primary La Lioness Priyanka Jan 2017 #42
Well there is that minor issue. LOL. nt fleabiscuit Jan 2017 #44
Woulda Shoulda Coulda.. only BS lost the primary by 4 Millions Cha Jan 2017 #45
Didn't work that way in the Primary. Lil Missy Jan 2017 #49
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Here is why Bernie would ...»Reply #41