Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
24. Once again, I wonder if you read the post.
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 03:42 PM
Jan 2017

I even explained why the speeches were not so mystifying, since that is LITERALLY what every past Sec of State has done. The fact that SHE did them and was compensated commensurate with her stature is what gets everyone's goat, but you criticizer her and bring up Monica, because you literally don't get how your mindset oozes your dislike. Perhaps if you read the piece, some of your confusions would be cleared up.

I'm sorry, but there was nothing unprincipled here, nor were they "stands", nor did conscience enter into the matter. What future political costs? I mean literally, none have ever been exacted from ANYONE other than her, special rules for her, to which no one ever in history has ever been held to. What we've learned here is that she will be attacked, by everyone, even people who think they're making principled stance where conscience plays a role, and who think bringing up her husband's mistakes to attack her once again is a legitimate thing to do and not utterly craven.

I would argue that you are missing the actual facts here, and that she did win in a landslide. It took voter suppression, failed voting machines and a legal push by the GOP to prevent actual counts of votes in suspect areas to steal this election.

Note, there was no email scandal, it was ginned up by RWers and kept alive by a complicit and incompetent media and taken up by factions that lack conscience and principles and which do indeed harbor an intense hatred for her, as exemplified in your own post, which seems blind to what it actually contains.

Consider that her email did no such thing, and took so such time, but that the GOP and the media and factions on the left flamed this nothingburger into yet another faux scandal that produced literally not a single thing. No crime, no violations, nothing. But like with Monica, the GOP and the anti-Clinton factions decided to make a hue and cry over it, because they knew that they could and that people who enjoy hating the Clintons and who deny their own misogyny would eat it up with a spoon.

Consider that the flaws here are not hers, but those of her haters who still cannot own that they blatantly demonstrate with every utterance.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I honestly think being a woman metroins Jan 2017 #1
A lot of that overall hatred and quite a bit of Trumpism is rooted in misogyny. synergie Jan 2017 #2
+1000 sheshe2 Jan 2017 #4
So true! boston bean Jan 2017 #12
+1 uponit7771 Jan 2017 #14
I don't believe that. People who voted for Trump would have voted for Palin. Exilednight Jan 2017 #28
Of course you don't. nt JTFrog Jan 2017 #35
if you think misogyny had nothing to do with it, you are really in la-la land. 30 years of niyad Jan 2017 #5
Also don't forget that it is difficult for one pantry to hold the oval office for more ... spin Jan 2017 #7
How do you define "Trumpism" brer cat Jan 2017 #8
Of course you do. nt JTFrog Jan 2017 #34
Thank you for this, synergie.. will Cha Jan 2017 #3
Great read. sheshe2 Jan 2017 #6
Still makes me furious mcar Jan 2017 #9
Fantastic OP, synergie! brer cat Jan 2017 #10
ANY losing candidate goes through that same nonsense karynnj Jan 2017 #11
I think you're missing the point here, which was that this was happening throughout synergie Jan 2017 #16
I guess you missed the intra party attacks in 2000, 2004 and 200 karynnj Jan 2017 #21
Once again, I wonder if you read the post. synergie Jan 2017 #24
What you ignore is that even when she was SoS, there were congressional and Foia requests for her karynnj Jan 2017 #25
The question has never been answered honestly... Yurovsky Jan 2017 #26
So you STILL have not read the post, as you attack her to illustrate how it's not about synergie Jan 2017 #27
Look, I know you LOVE the piece, which incidentally you posted more than you are allowed to karynnj Jan 2017 #29
Wow, you "know" a lot of things that you can't support, don't you? synergie Jan 2017 #31
Talk about unsupported statements! That describes this karynnj Jan 2017 #32
I think we need to elect a woman as VP before we'll elect one president crazycatlady Jan 2017 #13
She was held to a much higher standard than any other candidate in Presidential history. Tatiana Jan 2017 #15
Exactly right. 100% oasis Jan 2017 #17
As the father of two daughters, I am so disappointed with this election Gothmog Jan 2017 #18
K&R! betsuni Jan 2017 #19
So, Clinton was "flawed." WTF does that make Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2017 #20
The media could not have fluffed up the email scandal treestar Jan 2017 #22
That's a crock of excrement meow2u3 Jan 2017 #23
People just sat back and watched bogus investigation after investigation Rex Jan 2017 #30
Well said.... Blue_Tires Jan 2017 #33
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Flawed: Perfect Is The En...»Reply #24