Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: White progressive analysis of politics is fundamentally broken. [View all]betsuni
(27,404 posts)96. +1
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
217 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
White progressive analysis of politics is fundamentally broken. [View all]
forjusticethunders
Jan 2017
OP
Workers forming unions in low-pay countries is good for those workers but my fear...
brush
Jan 2017
#78
That is certainly the way I interpreted it, but I'm happy to be educated on this matter if anyone
JCanete
Jan 2017
#151
I have always advocated for protectionism that has a basis on proper living standards of the workers
JCanete
Jan 2017
#178
"the productivity of a HS worker here is greater than a low skilled worker in Vietnam"
Garrett78
Jan 2017
#180
It may be fluff like you said previously, but the language is there. But will it be enforced?
Garrett78
Jan 2017
#157
The problem is that this analysis is "right" but it's also tactically useless.
forjusticethunders
Jan 2017
#9
Do you actually believe that Sanders SUPPORTERS(I'm not talking about Bernie-he's just one voice)
Ken Burch
Jan 2017
#141
I particularly loathe it when people claim bernie supporters don't care about
dionysus
Jan 2017
#212
Racism is largely what enables that economic injustice and corporate domination.
Garrett78
Jan 2017
#12
That's true and it makes it hard to talk to certain groups of people about racial injustice, because
dionysus
Jan 2017
#214
What people don't get, in spite of forjusticethunder's excellent explanation, is...
Garrett78
Jan 2017
#22
I think we should work together to find a new leader we both sides can get behind
bravenak
Jan 2017
#38
Bigotry isn't intrinsic and it isn't for nothing. Sure, not being at the bottom might be
JCanete
Jan 2017
#94
absent racism, the Republican Party would cease to be a viable institution
Grey Lemercier
Jan 2017
#147
Yep, replying to my own post to share 2 excerpts from Obama's speech last night:
Garrett78
Jan 2017
#171
That is right, and it was awesome to hear him point that out. He also said that we need to listen to
JCanete
Jan 2017
#175
God! This is not rocket science. We have to fight both equally, especially since a huge part of ...
brush
Jan 2017
#65
It is, but if the framing isn't right, it can backfire. White people in poverty, in areas that don'
dionysus
Jan 2017
#213
If you can be driven away because discussions about racism, you were never with us to begin with n/t
kcr
Jan 2017
#97
People here are not "discussing racism." They are assuming that people are racists.
NoGoodNamesLeft
Jan 2017
#126
Okay, but do you do it for the personal reward of it or because it's right? If you're doing
JCanete
Jan 2017
#133
those are words to live by, but my point in one of the threads about being careful about a
JCanete
Jan 2017
#140
I said that because I have been trying for weeks to have productive conversation, however
NoGoodNamesLeft
Jan 2017
#189
Typically the message has been "Trump voters can fuck off," which I also disagree with on both
JCanete
Jan 2017
#127
There is a MASSIVE difference between ingrained biases in society and racism
NoGoodNamesLeft
Jan 2017
#131
But that is strategy, and I totally agree with it, versus your own personal sensitivity to it, which
JCanete
Jan 2017
#134
trump voters or trump supporters? That is, people actually fond of trump, or people who helped to
JCanete
Jan 2017
#193
I'm going to presume that most of his Birther supporters identified in the poll voted for him.
Garrett78
Jan 2017
#197
It's unfortunate you think the post is a personal attack against all white people:
JHan
Jan 2017
#95
People being opposed to immigration is not usually about racism, it's about the economy too
NoGoodNamesLeft
Jan 2017
#128
Then perhaps the OP should not have singled out white people in the thread title
NoGoodNamesLeft
Jan 2017
#86
Building a multiracial alliance is not easy but it can be done with concerted effort.
Garrett78
Jan 2017
#25
No, they don't. They vote against their interests because they believe lies.
NoGoodNamesLeft
Jan 2017
#74
Before there is any hope of having a meaningful conversation about racism,
Dark n Stormy Knight
Jan 2017
#206
Unfortunately, I think it would be like passing legislation requiring us to all love one another.
jalan48
Jan 2017
#109
Dividing groups in society against one another to gain power goes back thousands of years.
jalan48
Jan 2017
#114
How do we get the votes? By reaching out to others and showing them who the real enemy is.
jalan48
Jan 2017
#162
While society has enlightened itself, however slowly, over time and continues
dionysus
Jan 2017
#215
I've read it 4 times now, but still don't get what the OP is trying to say. (nt)
PotatoChip
Jan 2017
#27
The only way to take down the oligarchy is to end the racism they invented to keep
bravenak
Jan 2017
#45
Labor in the white skin can never free itself as long as labor in the black skin is branded.
forjusticethunders
Jan 2017
#47
Why do working class whites vote for policies that actively screw them?
forjusticethunders
Jan 2017
#49
Our generation is really progressive, though white millennials still broke for Trump.
forjusticethunders
Jan 2017
#63
unfortunately the post Millennials (iGen, Gen Z, whatever you wish to call them, people born post
Grey Lemercier
Jan 2017
#150
I'm very skeptical about this. Everybody in the 14-18 age cohort I've interacted with
forjusticethunders
Jan 2017
#155
yes absolutely. But that means we have to look at the people using the tools. We can't fix this
JCanete
Jan 2017
#50
You have to tie that racist brainwashing to the money. That kind of means you have to show them
JCanete
Jan 2017
#70
yeah, there are things that can be done here for sure. Case by case is a little slow, but of course,
JCanete
Jan 2017
#118
Yes, I agree that conversations about race can't be for a later date. Focusing on its usage as a
JCanete
Jan 2017
#120
I have a big crush on your posts, forjusticethunders. Thank you and moar please.
betsuni
Jan 2017
#98
The ACA-Obamacare dichotomy would be funny if it wasn't so damn consequential.
Garrett78
Jan 2017
#142
The Republicans always run on the economy when they win. Trump certainly did.
Kentonio
Jan 2017
#152
Hillary won "economy" voters and lost "immigration and terrorism" voters.
forjusticethunders
Jan 2017
#154
The Democratic electorate is diverse but divided, and not great enough in number.
Garrett78
Jan 2017
#164
It's the whole media in different ways, and radio is absolutely still a big part of it, but yep...
JCanete
Jan 2017
#165
"...no American worker movement will succeed so long as racism remains rampant in America."
Garrett78
Jan 2017
#201
Decimation of unions was enabled by racism. And addressing racism is key to labor movement success.
Garrett78
Jan 2017
#203
But unions have been successful in the past when racism was even stronger than it is now.
Willie Pep
Jan 2017
#204