Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]onenote
(44,915 posts)30. that article ignores the key passage from ex parte Milligan
"If, in foreign invasion or civil war, the courts are actually closed, and it is impossible to administer criminal justice according to law, then, on the theatre of active military operations, where war really prevails, there is a necessity to furnish a substitute for the civil authority, thus overthrown, to preserve the safety of the army and society; and as no power is left but the military, it is allowed to govern by martial rule until the laws can have their free course. As necessity creates the rule, so it limits its duration; for, if this government is continued after the courts are reinstated, it is a gross usurpation of power. Martial rule can never exist where the courts are open, and in the proper and unobstructed exercise of their jurisdiction. It is also confined to the locality of actual war."
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So next time a Democrat wins, GOPers can take same action? We need to nail Trump for what he
Hoyt
Jan 2017
#11
Apparently the founders didn't envision a situation where the president elect
dflprincess
Jan 2017
#4
No. Of course, I suppose there could be serious rioting in the streets
PoindexterOglethorpe
Jan 2017
#14
I believe she can... And the Supreme Court could step in and rule on it - even the same day.
ElementaryPenguin
Jan 2017
#41
These posts are embarrassing. There is literally nothing in our constitution that
mythology
Jan 2017
#50