Note: the author of the article in the OP is Carl Gibson, co-founder of US Uncut.
Here's the old event: http://anarchistnews.org/node/14316
The press coverage since Saturday has gone into a well-rehearsed frenzy of 'good protestor/bad protestor'. Some UK Uncutters have expressed outrage at being lumped in with the 'bad protestors', (correctly) stressing the peaceful nature of the F&M occupation. We think the whole idea of dividing 'good' and 'bad' protest serves only to legitimise police violence and repression. As we saw on Saturday, repression is not provoked by violent actions, but by effective actions there is a long history of peaceful pickets and occupations being violently broken up by police, from the Chartists to the Miners Strike. Indeed, UK Uncut have frequently been at the blunt end of this in recent memory yourselves, with police responding to non-violent occupations with pepper spray and violent arrests.
In this light, we would say keep up the good work. Let the mass arrests strengthen your resolve not deter you. And lets not fall into the divide-and-rule tactics that are the oldest trick in the richs book. If we can help or offer any practical solidarity to the arrestees, please get in touch. Weve previously hosted legal advice and training sessions with Fitwatch and the Legal Defence and Monitoring Group wed be happy to do this again. Or if the arrests are causing problems with employers, we'll help arrestees organise against victimisation. On Saturday most of the arrestees were UK Uncut activists. Next time it could be us. We those of us fighting the cuts are all in this together.
This anti-anarchist sentiment is a "good protester / bad protester" vs "good city management / bad city management" PSYOPS.
OCCUPY IS DEAD, OCCUPY HAS BARELY BEGUN:
http://www.adbusters.org/blogs/adbusters-blog/occupy-spiritual-quest.html
Divide and conquer.