Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
116. This movement would destroy itself, if it were to do as you suggest. However, there are OWS
Tue Jun 26, 2012, 11:28 PM
Jun 2012

members running for office, and in fact, there are elected officials who are members of OWS.

But it should never, ever become a political movement. I think you are missing the whole idea behind this movement.

And can you name one thing about globalization that has been positive? nt Sarah Ibarruri May 2012 #1
Millions of people in Asia and Africa are now middle class. Bill Clinton wrote in his book that applegrove May 2012 #4
At the expense of the impoverishment of millions. Not good enough. Sarah Ibarruri May 2012 #5
The people who are impoverished are the subsistence farmers who face famine. That is a tough life. applegrove May 2012 #9
Capitalism and globalism consist of the rich taking the lion's share and leaving Sarah Ibarruri May 2012 #12
There is no requirement for participation pipoman May 2012 #13
No. Democracy takes ahold and people demand adequate taxes on the rich. Same thing Occupy is applegrove May 2012 #17
Not without the right to demand anything, pipoman May 2012 #19
Free trade as established by our trade agreements destroys democracy -- our own JDPriestly Jun 2012 #67
+1 OrwellwasRight Jun 2012 #76
totally agreed! donheld Aug 2012 #137
I agree with JDPriestly above. girl gone mad Jul 2012 #124
They move off the subsistence farms as American farmers did back in the 1930s JDPriestly May 2012 #20
+1 limpyhobbler May 2012 #23
That is the same argument Mi$$ Rmoney and the Teabaggers use. Got another? jtuck004 Jun 2012 #69
It is all part of the same neoliberal economic model. OrwellwasRight Jun 2012 #72
'We', who is 'we' who are a 'a lot richer'? We have the largest income inequality sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #99
Cute. But I stand by what I said. jtuck004 Jun 2012 #100
As I said, you will need more than your opinion sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #101
Good luck with your crusade. Sounds like you got it all figured out. n/t jtuck004 Jun 2012 #102
No, I don't have it all figured out. I just know the facts, figuring it all out is going to take a sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #108
Dictionaries and people on Jeopardy are full of facts too. Doesn't mean they accomplish much. jtuck004 Jun 2012 #109
We've all seen the egos served and their obscene bank accounts, which is why OWS sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #110
Ah, you think it takes money to be ego driven. jtuck004 Jun 2012 #112
All goals set by Occupy have been accomplished. sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #113
Well, sounds like you are suitably impressed. good luck. n/t jtuck004 Jun 2012 #114
I'm always impressed by success! sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #115
I'll be looking for other accomplishments beyond self-aggrandizement. Thanks. n/t jtuck004 Jun 2012 #117
I think you already missed them. sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #118
Lol, cute deflection. I have potatoes to feed, more important. But you don't need to have launched a jtuck004 Jun 2012 #120
Lol, nothing is a waste of time. I learned a lot, so thank you for that. sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #121
Yeah, what you said. And u asked what I have done. Today I saw two little girls running jtuck004 Jun 2012 #122
OWS shouldn't take credit for BoA changing it's debit card fees Chathamization Jun 2012 #119
Aproaching? We're there nadinbrzezinski Jun 2012 #107
and now millions of people in America who used to be middle class 2pooped2pop May 2012 #24
applegrove has no response to that. THIS is why anti-globalism is ascendant in America. Zalatix Jun 2012 #52
You have nailed it. truedelphi Jun 2012 #57
Because the rich have taken over in the usa with tax cuts and economic bubbles that they make money applegrove Jun 2012 #73
At the expense of the United States losing its sovereignty, JDPriestly Jun 2012 #65
trade does not stop wars OrwellwasRight Jun 2012 #70
That is what I take issue with. Demonstrators will say they are anti-capitalist when they mean applegrove Jun 2012 #71
But they aren't just "anti pure capitalism" OrwellwasRight Jun 2012 #75
But Obama is for trade. If you say you are antiglobal trade you cut out a whole host of people in applegrove Jun 2012 #78
Yes, Obama is for trade. That doesn't make him right. OrwellwasRight Jun 2012 #82
They are anti-CORRUPTION sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #111
I can think of several positive things. Zalatix Jun 2012 #54
Probably not.... movonne May 2012 #2
I've been hearing of the imminent demise of Occupy since the day it started MannyGoldstein May 2012 #3
Occupy is the only truth-telling organization today. nt Sarah Ibarruri May 2012 #6
That's funny!!! greytdemocrat May 2012 #26
Clearly you know of more organizations speaking truth to power? Care to share? nt Sarah Ibarruri May 2012 #41
+1 emulatorloo May 2012 #7
Is this your mission here? The daily slam? Warren Stupidity May 2012 #8
I'm objecting to the change of focus from inequality onto all manner of leftist causes. I have a applegrove May 2012 #11
You're just objecting. Nothing has changed. Warren Stupidity May 2012 #15
Occupy wasn't anti-NATO or anti global. It was anti-power in the hands of a few - same as Arab applegrove May 2012 #16
nato is the militarized arm of the 1% 2pooped2pop May 2012 #25
Absolutely correct - and anyone who is not questioning unfettered capitalism TBF May 2012 #33
I doubt many people who are offended by OWS UnrepentantLiberal May 2012 #30
EXCUSE ME, drynberg Jun 2012 #56
I am a big supporter of Occupy. I want to see it become a permanent world wide movement to fight the applegrove May 2012 #18
I understand ur concerns 2pooped2pop May 2012 #27
What type of "inequality" are you seeking to fight? TBF May 2012 #34
The rich buying the government. A lack of taxes on the rich. Credit card legislation that helps applegrove May 2012 #35
And you've seen what happened to the world in the past 50 years TBF May 2012 #36
You are talking about what has happened to America in the last 50 years. Other countries, like mine applegrove May 2012 #37
This is a student protest in Montreal - YESTERDAY - you're doing smashingly. nt TBF May 2012 #38
Students in Quebec don't want to pay $3000 dollars a term for University. They are applegrove May 2012 #39
I have a feeling your definition of "lucky" and mine vary widely. TBF May 2012 #40
why are so many Canadians obssessed with American political forums? girl gone mad Jul 2012 #125
There is only a housing bubble in Toronto and Vancouver (two cities that have had high housing applegrove Jul 2012 #129
+ my household. n/t truedelphi Jun 2012 #61
No, pipoman May 2012 #10
Bull shit. Nt xchrom May 2012 #14
They're making one fatal mistake - they're not running anyone kysrsoze May 2012 #21
Occupy can neither support nor engage the very system causing all of our trouble. Fire Walk With Me May 2012 #42
Getting involved in elections Chathamization May 2012 #47
None of them are even discussing taking back the trillions upon trillions of dollars given to banks Fire Walk With Me May 2012 #48
It's insane Chathamization May 2012 #49
Yes on all counts. Fire Walk With Me May 2012 #50
In San diego alone we had three candidates for congress in three different districts nadinbrzezinski Jun 2012 #106
This movement would destroy itself, if it were to do as you suggest. However, there are OWS sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #116
Instead of anti-globalization, think alter-globalization. We want FAIR trade. limpyhobbler May 2012 #22
Then OWS should be clear that they want to alter globalization not end it. And they should be clear applegrove May 2012 #44
The movement has people with diverse views who agree on some common actions. limpyhobbler May 2012 #45
Was there ever? tama Aug 2012 #138
In the sense the Capitalism includes PROFIT ... GeorgeGist May 2012 #28
IMO, your Third Way neo-liberal 1% plutarchy supporting propaganda is not Zorra May 2012 #29
My positions are like Obamas on world trade and nato. applegrove May 2012 #31
Ah. I get it. That's why you framed the debate so well right in the subject line of your OP. Zorra May 2012 #32
Your positions are like that of the Koch's and the US Chamber of Commerce. Zalatix Jun 2012 #53
No they are not. They are like Obama's. Like the vast majority of people in the USA. Occupy touched applegrove Jun 2012 #79
Yes, your ideas ARE aligned with the US Chamber of Commerce. Zalatix Jun 2012 #83
My ideas are the same as Obama's. That is who I follow. The right wing wins if Occupy becomes a applegrove Jun 2012 #85
Nope, your views are in line with the US Chamber of Commerce. Not Obama. Zalatix Jun 2012 #86
I'm sorry but I follow Obama on trade policy. You can say 'nope' all you want. I know the right applegrove Jun 2012 #87
I know you're wrong. Obama signed a tariff law. You oppose tariffs. You know you're wrong. Zalatix Jun 2012 #88
I don't oppose tariffs. I'm for tariffs on chinese goods if they are messing with their dollar. applegrove Jun 2012 #91
So your OP was an attack on a straw man? Zalatix Jun 2012 #92
Like Bill Clinton said, America is winning on trade except for China and the middle east. The applegrove Jun 2012 #93
Do you support Obama's 2008 position on trade, or his 2012 position? limpyhobbler Jun 2012 #98
If your position on trade is the same as Obama's OrwellwasRight Jun 2012 #74
I totally agree money is corrupting politics and the 1% have too much power. Why I want to see applegrove Jun 2012 #80
How do you think you can fight that OrwellwasRight Jun 2012 #81
Thank you greatly for making this apparent to those truedelphi Jun 2012 #58
Against corrupt capitalism, certainly, and has been so from the beginning. Fire Walk With Me May 2012 #43
World trade and capitalism are the primary tools of the 1%. Hatchling May 2012 #46
Considering that the majority of Americans are AGAINST offshoring, Occupy will win BIG on this one. Zalatix Jun 2012 #51
Stand with you in Solidarity of Occupy. n/t truedelphi Jun 2012 #59
Without inequality there is no capitalism. Inequality drives the system. TheKentuckian Jun 2012 #55
You seem to have ignored a most vital truedelphi Jun 2012 #60
THERE ARE OVER 70 MILLION DEMOCRATS IN THIS COUNTRY. secondwind Jun 2012 #62
As a left-libertarian, I'm opposed to Occupy being co-opted by Old Left and various Old Left groups Leopolds Ghost Jun 2012 #63
Opposing trade agreements is wise. These trade agreements are a cover for the JDPriestly Jun 2012 #64
Bill Clinton pointed out in his book that the only trade the USA was not doing well on in balance applegrove Jun 2012 #66
Do we have trade agreements with China or Opec Oil countries that bind us JDPriestly Jun 2012 #68
He has since then admitted that his idea that we could save Haiti through trade OrwellwasRight Jun 2012 #77
This is the truth about free trade - it's all about keeping Chinese and Haitians poor. Zalatix Jun 2012 #84
Wow. That's disgusting. OrwellwasRight Jun 2012 #89
The answer is that we fight against capitalism globally. TBF Jun 2012 #94
We would have supported them by fighting for an $8/hour minimum wage in Haiti. Zalatix Jun 2012 #95
What crap. Capitalism is the problem. Socialism is the solution. Odin2005 Jun 2012 #90
It depends on the brand of Capitalism egbertowillies Jun 2012 #96
Then why don't they call it 'casino capitalism' on the signs. It alienates OWS from part applegrove Jun 2012 #97
Capitalism As We Know It tama Aug 2012 #139
I highly recommend you become VERY FAMILIAR with the term HARMONIZATION nadinbrzezinski Jun 2012 #103
I'm not denying trade with China is bad. They are messing with their currency and should face applegrove Jun 2012 #104
It's not china nadinbrzezinski Jun 2012 #105
Understand Remember Jun 2012 #123
I'm With You on This On the Road Jul 2012 #126
It's crucial to distinguish kinds of "globalism." snot Jul 2012 #127
Every single reply in this thread to the OP is OFF TOPIC. Speck Tater Jul 2012 #128
Occupy will lose some of its support, not most of it. But it was those supporters that had woken up applegrove Jul 2012 #130
Doesn't matter. Chan790 Jul 2012 #131
Also rw libertarians tama Aug 2012 #140
This promises to be an erudite conversation! JackRiddler Jul 2012 #132
My point is the middle class came together over inequlity during that occupy fall. Don't we want to applegrove Jul 2012 #133
Your terms are seriously skewed. JackRiddler Jul 2012 #134
My terms are not skewed. I'm make an observation. Occupy appealed to over 50% of Americans applegrove Jul 2012 #135
91% of Democrats and 87% of Republicans oppose offshoring. Zalatix Aug 2012 #136
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Occupy Underground»So now Occupy is against ...»Reply #116