Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Occupy Underground
In reply to the discussion: Opening up Discussion on Hosting Guidelines [View all]Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)50. What if hosts enforced SoP by
simple consensus (in the absence of objection from another host)
other hosts would know about it prior to block because hosts
would be required to post a warning in-thread (thus notifying
the group as a whole) and PM other hosts prior to blocking a user
and public group consensus were used to:
Appeal to two other hosts for un-banning.
Such a discussion could happen wiki-style
(thus solving the issue of users disrupting their own appeal)
Just an idea / possible solution for the specific issue you bring up. Might be a good one, no idea if it's the best one.
One concern would be avoiding arbitrary locks/blocks, which is what gives hosts chilling executive authority.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Group membership is a vexing issue, given current software limitations.
Old and In the Way
Feb 2012
#1
Under the current draft of the principles that was approved on Occupy du2, the lead host has no more
Leopolds Ghost
Feb 2012
#12
Yeah, it's a problem with the way the system is geared to hosting as private groups
Leopolds Ghost
Feb 2012
#16
Simple majority vote is not required for Occupy GAs to function well. So I don't think it's an issue
Leopolds Ghost
Feb 2012
#11
It is possible to use polls for consensus. The principles as currently written call for consensus
Leopolds Ghost
Feb 2012
#8
I wonder if the MIRT team couldn't be tasked with alerts that include an SoP violation?
Old and In the Way
Feb 2012
#28
I thought we're trying to have a non-heirarchical structure, not rely on MIRT. jmho n/t
Leopolds Ghost
Feb 2012
#35
Regarding DU2 -- all the work that went into creating this forum came from DU2rs -- if you think
Leopolds Ghost
Feb 2012
#10
The main host does not select co-hosts under the current draft, the group does
Leopolds Ghost
Feb 2012
#38
It was pointed out in the H&M thread many times where the work was being done. Occupy uses consensus
Leopolds Ghost
Feb 2012
#34
Why can't the DU2 work be presented here and accepted or not by us all? Why would anyone want to
Vincardog
Feb 2012
#33
Ellisonz, can you facilitate the thread I opened up here thats a mirror of the du2 thread?
Leopolds Ghost
Feb 2012
#5
Not at all. It's simply that we posted numerous links back to the threads on the group formation
Leopolds Ghost
Feb 2012
#15