Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Beastly Boy

(10,919 posts)
4. I have a bad habit of checking the sources to verify information, and it appears that Resolution 1701 expected UNIFIL
Tue Oct 15, 2024, 04:30 PM
Tuesday

to do quite a bit more than you do.

Thus, after
- "Expressing its utmost concern at the continuing escalation of hostilities in Lebanon and in Israel since Hizbollah’s attack on Israel on 12 July 2006" and
- "emphasizing the need to address urgently the causes that have given rise to the current crisis, including by the unconditional release of the abducted Israeli soldiers, and
- welcoming Lebanon's effort "to extend its authority over its territory, through its own legitimate armed forces, such that there will be no weapons without the consent of the Government of Lebanon and no authority other than that of the Government of Lebanon", and
- noting "a United Nations force that is supplemented and enhanced in numbers, equipment,mandate and scope of operation, and
- being aware of Lebanon's " request the assistance of additional forces from the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) as
needed, to facilitate the entry of the Lebanese armed forces into the region", among other things,

the UN resolved to
- call "upon the Government of Lebanon and UNIFIL as authorized by paragraph 11 to deploy their forces together throughout the South and calls upon the Government of Israel, as that deploymentbegins, to withdraw all of its forces from southern Lebanon in parallel", and
- insure that there "will be no weapons without the consent of the Government of Lebanon and no authority other than that of the Government of Lebanon", and
- affirm "that all parties [including UNIFIL] are responsible for ensuring that no action is taken contrary to paragraph 1 that might adversely affect the search for a long-term solution, and affirm the principles that include "the establishment between the Blue Line and the Litani river of an area free of any armed personnel, assets and weapons other than those of the Government of Lebanon and of UNIFIL", and "disarmament of all armed groups in Lebanon, so that, pursuant to the Lebanese cabinet decision of 27 July 2006, there will be no weapons or authority in Lebanon other than thatof the Lebanese State" and that :no sales or supply of arms and related materiel to Lebanon except as
authorized by its Government", and
- decide to "authorize an increase in the force strength of UNIFIL to a maximum of 15,000 troops, so they may "monitor the cessation of hostilities"; accompany and support the Lebanese armed forces as they deploy throughout the South, including along the Blue Line", "coordinate its activities related to paragraph 11 (b) with the Government of Lebanon and the Government of Israel" and "assist the Lebanese armed forces", among other things.
- authorize "UNIFIL to take all necessary action in areas of deployment of its forces and as it deems within its capabilities, to ensure that its area of operations is not utilized for hostile activities of any kind", and
- request "the Secretary-General urgently to put in place measures to ensure UNIFIL is able to carry out the functions envisaged in this resolution", among other things.
http://unscr.com/en/resolutions/doc/1701

Now you tell me, how many missions did UNIFIL fail to accomplish, as per Resolution 1701?

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Middle East»The role of UNIFIL seems ...»Reply #4