Feminism and Diversity

obamanut2012

(28,307 posts)

4. I did like how some of the control and power was transferred to

Wed Feb 22, 2012, 04:33 PM

Feb 2012

Aibileen in the movie, instead of leaving it in Skeeter's hands.

Yes, it was indeed odd to me that the only male really fleshed out, on side of Skeeter's boyfriend, was Mr. Johnny, who was definitely NOT an enforcer of the legal and social mores of that time and place. I will give a little bit of slack here that he MAY have changed attitudes a bit, because his wife was an outsider as much as the maids, even ore IN SOME WAYS (ie they were allowed in houses Celia wasn't, albeit only as domestics).

Making Hilly the Face of Segregation was annoying as hell to me. Women in that time and place , white women with money, had very, very little power or influence on society. They didn't make the rules. Or the laws. Or enforce them. Or decide to concede on rare occasions. They weren't the ones who murdered and raped. They were petty tyrants to their domestics, which of course is classic behavior when the oppressed are give some power over the even more oppressed.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Intersectionality in Movies: The Help [View all] obamanut2012 Feb 2012 OP

Interesting review, and I agree that the complete absence of the male was troubling Warpy Feb 2012 #1

I did like how some of the control and power was transferred to obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #4

Are you gonna make me watch this movie? justiceischeap Feb 2012 #2

Watch it for Viola Davis, Octavia Spencer, and Jessica Chastain obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #5

I'm going to have to read the book, or... TreasonousBastard Feb 2012 #3

VERY interesting! obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #6

The book is well written and an interesting read Warpy Feb 2012 #7

I read the book and disliked it so much I avoided the movie. Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #8

The scary thing is, she thinks it's wonderful and all civil roghtsie obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #9

My take on it. Neoma Feb 2012 #10

If you want to better understand the perspective, you might try reading more written from it. laconicsax Feb 2012 #11

There's a lot to unpack there. Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #12

And also reactions from Southern whites knowing she was being crazy racist obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #13

Wow, I never thought about that. Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #14

You didn't threadjack at all obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #15

Not having read the book or seen the movie, I still have an opinion/question justiceischeap Feb 2012 #16

I think they saw $$$$$ and didn't care obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #17

I'll try to watch it over the weekend. justiceischeap Feb 2012 #18

It's old attitudes that are passed on. Neoma Feb 2012 #20

you're kidding right? Most white people don't come from priveleged backgrounds. Just like most Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #25

I was explaining exactly that... Neoma Feb 2012 #26

you implied through your language that not all but most were rich. Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #31

As I said in explanation: Neoma Feb 2012 #32

I never said they did obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #27

Meh, I was verging off topic. Neoma Feb 2012 #28

As I recall history, the ladder of inequality went something like this: justiceischeap Feb 2012 #29

Yep. Neoma Feb 2012 #30

You forgot Italians and Chinese immigrants Tx4obama Feb 2012 #35

Wow there are so many great posts in this thread Catherina Feb 2012 #19

Therein lies the problem. Neoma Feb 2012 #21

I knew about the lawsuit, which shows what a poser Stockett was obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #23

As history, the movie clearly fails. mistertrickster Feb 2012 #22

Skeeter's maid's name was Constantine obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #24

I did not like the movie JustAnotherGen Feb 2012 #33

You know...you've made me rethink my enjoyment of the book. ScreamingMeemie Feb 2012 #34

"Why now?" Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #36