Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malthaussen

(17,589 posts)
1. Pretty stupid argument.
Tue Jun 17, 2014, 10:50 AM
Jun 2014

Even if it were true, if men are drawn to "dangerous" jobs, it means nothing when talking about what the pay should be for those jobs or the "non-dangerous" ones. Stupid and specious. And crazy. So, if men are "naturally" drawn to jobs handling nuclear waste, that means that a male office worker should be paid more than a female one? Eh? Or that a male handler of nuclear waste "deserves" higher pay than a female doing the same work? Eh?

-- Mal

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Men, women, and hard and ...»Reply #1