Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

COLGATE4

(14,843 posts)

3. Meaning that at least one other Federal Appeals

Reply to MH1 (Reply #2)

Tue Dec 23, 2014, 08:24 AM

Dec 2014

Court has ruled the measure to be constitutional. In that case it will eventually go to the Supreme Court to determine which of the two conflicting opinions is in fact correct.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

In Victory for Women and Free Speech, Court Shuts Down State Ultrasound Law [View all] eridani Dec 2014 OP

Does that create a split? Downwinder Dec 2014 #1

Split? MH1 Dec 2014 #2

Meaning that at least one other Federal Appeals COLGATE4 Dec 2014 #3

and then we are effed. elehhhhna Dec 2014 #5

Quite possible. nt COLGATE4 Dec 2014 #6

Because, you know, "not a dime's worth of difference" and all that. MH1 Dec 2014 #8

Right on! ismnotwasm Dec 2014 #4

Kudos to the judge for not being a RW partisan hack about this. merrily Dec 2014 #7