Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

In reply to the discussion: For Lucy and Anarcha [View all]

marym625

(17,997 posts)
7. Not surprising
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:13 PM
Feb 2015

Just despicable. Outrageous. Horrifying. Inexcusable. But not surprising.

Just like most women dying from a hysterectomy, they, the first, were really just guinea pigs without anesthesia. I'm sure that more slaves were used than we'll ever know. Probably didn't record those failures.

And in the US, more hysterectomies are performed than anywhere else in the world.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hysterectomy

2003, over 600,000 hysterectomies were performed in the United States alone, of which over 90% were performed for benign conditions.[1] Such rates being highest in the industrialized world has led to the major controversy that hysterectomies are being largely performed for unwarranted and unnecessary reasons


And we all know why they named it hysterectomy in the first place, to remove the hysteria.

Men.

Thanks for the post. Great information.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

For Lucy and Anarcha [View all] mercuryblues Feb 2015 OP
Thanks for all the research, mercuryblues. sheshe2 Feb 2015 #1
I wish mercuryblues Feb 2015 #2
Go see a response from Triana here. sheshe2 Feb 2015 #3
I think I am mercuryblues Feb 2015 #4
I think that you summed it up in a nutshell, merc. sheshe2 Feb 2015 #6
I just cross posted this to the African American Group sheshe2 Feb 2015 #5
Not surprising marym625 Feb 2015 #7
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»For Lucy and Anarcha»Reply #7