Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ismnotwasm

(42,486 posts)
10. Interesting, and very well written--thank you (I like long posts when they are good)
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 01:16 PM
Apr 2015

The first I ever heard of a non-police state, indeed, a non-incarceration policy was at a Native American pow-wow, many years ago. This is another group that suffers from extreme economic disparity, high rate of violence since, disease and early death, including one of the highest rates of maternal death. Certain, but not all bands (a pet peeve of mine is when NA bands are grouped together in a category labeled "alike", but I'm no doubt preaching to the choir) had alternatives for antisocial or just poor behavior, and as those no longer became feasible, fell into what is, for our purposes a white euro-centric model of the police state.

There was in the news some years back a young man who committed a serious crime. What his band wanted to do, more for rehabilition than punishment, was to isolate him, and force him to live without most modern trappings, to become self-suffient on the land in a traditional manner (which wasn't easy) I thought this a capital idea.

You are saying In your example (in a nutshell) that profit drives racism, so what do we eliminate, the profit or the racism? Or in other words, would the end of the prison-industrial pattern of police/incarceration end racism?

Or would it find an expression in another way?

I agree that that economic issues and social justice issues can difficult to separate when talking about larger policy, but what about day to day reality of walking around as a person of Color?

Truth to tell, it all comes down to action, how do we start? I believe we start by 'ending' racism, with the recognition racism expresses itself in the "death by a thousand cuts" manner so often it's different to quantify. Now laws are in place for this, it's illegal to discriminate--what are we seeing as a result? A slow growth of the AA middle class combined with mass incarceration rates for black males. This is a result of the police state yes, but also deliberately designed drug laws aimed at poor Black youth. Poor White youth are not deliberately tossed away in this manner (except in war)

If we say, these are racist laws, they are unconstitutional, we will end them, if we reinstate affirmative action, we seriously address reparations--these are social justice measures.

In fact, addressing social injustice might well be the only way to rid ourselves of the police state--and I must say I'm in full agreement with you there. Unlike many here, I'm not antagonistic to police just because they're police. I've known too many pathologically anti-social people that are simply human predators.

I would, however, like to see police morph into social justice workers/warriors, mediators and community workers. I think there is a place for them, just not as it is right now--shooting black youth on the street with impunity.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #1
thank you. and to be clear. i used fuck instead of fug, cause a juror said they would hide me, if seabeyond Apr 2015 #2
Bahaha did they really? F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #4
yes i am. screwed either way, that is. fug it. seabeyond Apr 2015 #5
Love the graphic GeoWilliam750 May 2015 #29
lol lol geo. all over the place. ah ha.... seabeyond May 2015 #30
Well. Obama said to the toadys at the WHCD, 'Bucket.' He didn't mean a mop and bucket, either... n/t freshwest Apr 2015 #20
Love this ismnotwasm Apr 2015 #3
You say it has to happen before economic justice... F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #6
We are human first ismnotwasm Apr 2015 #7
we are already on an unlevel economic playing field. we cannot start equality on an unlevel field. seabeyond Apr 2015 #8
I don't disagree with any of that. F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #9
Interesting, and very well written--thank you (I like long posts when they are good) ismnotwasm Apr 2015 #10
I was messaging with another member today JustAnotherGen Apr 2015 #12
excellent post. nt seabeyond Apr 2015 #13
Beautiful. n/t freshwest Apr 2015 #25
Our system seems based on divide and conquer GeoWilliam750 May 2015 #31
Because the highly touted economics first crowd of old, were about protecting white males. freshwest Apr 2015 #21
I never answer you? F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #22
I have edited it a lot, so kindly take a look at the finished work to reply. TIA. n/t freshwest Apr 2015 #23
Will do. nt F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #24
I will not be able to get to this until at least tomorrow night F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #27
My advice would be not to let the sideshow on DU BainsBane Apr 2015 #11
yes. sanders needs to be an advocate to black, women and gays. obama was good with our issues, seabeyond Apr 2015 #14
Do you know that he hasn't? BainsBane Apr 2015 #15
i know he absolutely supports us all, and his vote is there. no.... i have not heard him the seabeyond Apr 2015 #16
He seems very pro-woman, as well as--100% rating from NARAL ismnotwasm Apr 2015 #17
his vote is absolutely there. i want more. clinton promises more. our women, blacks and gays seabeyond Apr 2015 #18
Exactly ismnotwasm Apr 2015 #19
Here's an OP that I posted. To make it faster for you, here it is: freshwest Apr 2015 #26
This is very cool ismnotwasm May 2015 #28
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»This message was self-del...»Reply #10