Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Starry Messenger

(32,375 posts)
3. It's one of the first forms of oppression
Thu May 28, 2015, 11:01 PM
May 2015
https://www.marxists.org/archive/reed-evelyn/1970/caste-class-sex.htm



By virtue of the directing roles played by men in large-scale agriculture, irrigation and construction projects, as well as in stock raising, this surplus wealth was gradually appropriated by a hierarchy of men as their private property. This, in turn, required the institution of marriage and the family to fix the legal ownership and inheritance of a man’s property. Through monogamous marriage the wife was brought under the complete control of her husband who was thereby assured of legitimate sons to inherit his wealth.

As men took over most of the activities of social production, and with the rise of the family institution, women became relegated to the home to serve their husbands and families. The state apparatus came into existence to fortify and legalize the institutions of private property, male dominion and the father-family, which later were sanctified by religion.

This, briefly, is the Marxist approach to the origins of woman’s oppression. Her subordination did not come about through any biological deficiency as a sex. It was the result of the revolutionary social changes which destroyed the equalitarian society of the matriarchal gens or clan and replaced it with a patriarchal class society which, from its birth, was stamped with discriminations and inequalities of many kinds, including the inequality of the sexes. The growth of this inherently oppressive type of socio-economic organization was responsible for the historic downfall of women.



It's the basis of capitalist exploitation, which is what makes me o.O when so called "socialists" call things like abortion rights some kind of desert-topping that doesn't matter next to class. Class oppression was a replication and expansion of one of the original oppressions.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Oh yes shenmue May 2015 #1
This, exactly ismnotwasm May 2015 #2
It's one of the first forms of oppression Starry Messenger May 2015 #3
+1 freshwest Jun 2015 #4
Post removed Post removed Jun 2015 #6
Wrong. Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #7
That's not a very convincing argument Zamen Jun 2015 #8
Neither is this Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #9
Don't waste time waiting for his response. Orrex Jun 2015 #10
We were only seconds away from hearing about how hard he works hunting mammoth. Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #11
I really need to get my wife in line. Orrex Jun 2015 #12
Get her out there gathering berries! Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #13
Good post. Thanks! boston bean Jun 2015 #5
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»I've been trying to wrap ...»Reply #3