Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

(7,231 posts)

5. In that case, it might even refelct on online privacy.

Sun Jun 28, 2015, 10:10 AM

Jun 2015

Or am I taking the scope of the verdict's implications too far now?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What the Supreme Court’s marriage equality ruling means for reproductive rights [View all] gollygee Jun 2015 OP

Maybe another case Thespian2 Jun 2015 #1

Maybe this is why Roberts reluctantly disagreed. Betty Karlson Jun 2015 #2

In that case, it might even refelct on online privacy. Betty Karlson Jun 2015 #5

Yes, but every time it is reaffirmed in a scotus decision, the right gets more Warren DeMontague Jun 2015 #7

I wonder if that explains the truly execrable dissensions? ismnotwasm Jun 2015 #4

I don't think Kenedy was being prescient Gman Jun 2015 #6