Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

Gman

(24,780 posts)

6. I don't think Kenedy was being prescient

Reply to gollygee (Original post)

Sun Jun 28, 2015, 10:31 AM

Jun 2015

I think he purposefully inserted that anticipating future , like next year, cases.

I haven't had the time to read the decision, but that's a great find.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What the Supreme Court’s marriage equality ruling means for reproductive rights [View all] gollygee Jun 2015 OP

Maybe another case Thespian2 Jun 2015 #1

Maybe this is why Roberts reluctantly disagreed. Betty Karlson Jun 2015 #2

Idea of a constitutional right to privacy, one of the bases of Roe, is seen by many as a weakness in Panich52 Jun 2015 #3

In that case, it might even refelct on online privacy. Betty Karlson Jun 2015 #5

Yes, but every time it is reaffirmed in a scotus decision, the right gets more Warren DeMontague Jun 2015 #7

I wonder if that explains the truly execrable dissensions? ismnotwasm Jun 2015 #4

I don't think Kenedy was being prescient Gman Jun 2015 #6