Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: Clinton Calls Out Debate Moderators For Ignoring Women’s Health [View all]Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)38. Jury Results
Full disclosure: I was #1. Looks like somebody can't alert for 24 hours.
On Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:15 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
And I find all of your comments here to be antagonistic and insulting.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1255&pid=59149
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This guy probably shouldn't be trolling a feminist group and insisting that discussing issues important to them is pandering. Obviously disruptive.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:21 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's a civil post, and does not in any way violate DU rules. If it is inappropriate for this group is a matter for the group hosts to determine - not for a jury.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: OK, so I missed that this was in HOF when I first read it, but I have no idea how this is over the top or hide worthy. This seems like a pretty level headed discussion of how they see things. I'm sure they'll be banned from HOF shortly, but I'm not going to hide this. This would be a love poem in GDP.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: There is nothing in that post for a jury to consider. Not rude, OTT, etc, etc, etc. if the host of the group thinks the poster is out of line, they can ban them from the group.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Not hide worthy.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
And I find all of your comments here to be antagonistic and insulting.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1255&pid=59149
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This guy probably shouldn't be trolling a feminist group and insisting that discussing issues important to them is pandering. Obviously disruptive.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Apr 15, 2016, 12:21 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's a civil post, and does not in any way violate DU rules. If it is inappropriate for this group is a matter for the group hosts to determine - not for a jury.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: OK, so I missed that this was in HOF when I first read it, but I have no idea how this is over the top or hide worthy. This seems like a pretty level headed discussion of how they see things. I'm sure they'll be banned from HOF shortly, but I'm not going to hide this. This would be a love poem in GDP.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: There is nothing in that post for a jury to consider. Not rude, OTT, etc, etc, etc. if the host of the group thinks the poster is out of line, they can ban them from the group.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Not hide worthy.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This is a feminist group. We don't consider politicians actually discussing our issues to be
JTFrog
Apr 2016
#3
No your other commentary. You know....she must be pandering since no one else is willing to bring
JTFrog
Apr 2016
#5
No I don't think someone actually bringing up women's issues is fucking pandering.
JTFrog
Apr 2016
#7
How is being fucking PISSED about women's issues not having a place in the debate UNNECESSARY?
JTFrog
Apr 2016
#13
If you call it pandering, you are absolutely saying something negative about women's issues.
JTFrog
Apr 2016
#20
Again I think you're more concerned over a slight to Hillary rather than fact.
revbones
Apr 2016
#21
"This is a safe haven group, for likeminded members. If people don't like it here, they have the,
JTFrog
Apr 2016
#24
How on earth do you not see that calling attention to women's issues "cheap and pandering" is
JTFrog
Apr 2016
#30
I wasn't referring to you specifically, but more toward women's rights in general.
revbones
Apr 2016
#36
Your bias compels you to pretend she panders while Sanders, doing precisely the same thing,
LanternWaste
Apr 2016
#54
I highly doubt she would admit her willingness to compromise on the right to choose.
thereismore
Apr 2016
#28